Search results

I think the formation is usually more vertical than the one you have tried to display.

You have no idea what you are talking about. xoxo

Alright. You cracked the code, sweet. Now your only problem is you spent all that time to acquire something with a short expiration date. Hopefully you know other guru's as well.

I have a hard time believing that. And I can almost guarantee you, even if true, the time will come very soon where it has lost all edge. What/Who fits the definition of a guru?

You don't need all that back data. What works now essentially works now. Why care about 2003? But the only thing is are you sure somehow you are not getting preferential fills etc? Was that drawdown max loss? Was it max peak to valley? What is your MAE over this whole time?

Weak Earnings? Not really man. What are the statistics on how many have beat in the USA? Why am I a joke? You are one of those people that thinks they are always right and blah blah, when I was a kid shit. The US Equity markets more than make up for any dollar devaluation we have ever...

Good luck man I have found the edge in FX leaves you quicker than you think in most cases. 90% of anyone I am guessing who has ever traded FX knows exactly the pain you felt today. It is a lesson. Shame on you if it fools you two times.

Oh my bad baby D I was thinking payoff ratio. A thousand pardons.

OK. I guess this is basically the same thing. But I'll bite. Still what is the difference when you win a greater percentage of the time to make up for the factor that you lose by?

I am not wrong. Unless my calculation method is wrong, but I didn't say 3/4 of the time I said OVER 3/4 of the time.

Profit Factor = Avg Win / Avg Loss does it not? How much experience do you have with systems that trade in multiples of 1000 times per year?

OK, I see. Yeah, this is a good lesson to never play around with FX when NFP / Fin Min Khan farts because you are going to get fucked x1000 more than you would otherwise. I've lost plenty of money in FX to prove that haha. So in the end, I would really only trade the futures contracts...

try geeks.com they usually have some unreal deals that is definitely overpriced

Is it an ECN? Yeah, are you just worried about the spread? It could easily be possible because there is absolutely no liquidity at least for the few ms that the computers are deciding on what the fuck was just reported.

Why? I can lose 3 : 1 amount when I win over 3/4 times. Are you sure you aren't thinking Sharpe? EDIT: You aren't going to find a lot of med-high freq programs that have high profit factors. Not in all my research at least.

Can you better explain what happened, it is hard to read

Not if you have a sample size over 4000 winning 85% of the time. That is why PF is just total shit indicator. Everyone loves it though bc it is the easiest to manipulate.

You have good thinking. IMO and this is *IMO* Last 3-6 months is fluke territory 6-12 months will most likely provide a better overall makeup of what has been going on Now updating / refining your code once you have this is a different story in these timeframes. There is a...

no

Just make sure you are -59.9% and above the best bid :)