Search results

porgie, like i said YMMV my entries are all about statistics i have several setups (about 8 that i use consistently) and every single one has a very well researched risk/reward ratio, win %age etc. this can be skewed by other factors that i watch that are a bit more subjective (my...

as a prochoice (unlimited right for adults to access abortion in the first trimester) repub, i am very interested in the polling data that sight is weak a much more comprehensive meta-polling site is www.pollingreport.com read the abortion polls, crime polls, etc. very...

example. i have been buying gold as both a fundamental play, and a chart play. needless to say it has skyrocketed.

utter and complete rubbish it is not impossible to use both. i use both i profit obviously on a very short time frame, fundies are relatively meaningless. when intraday scalping the dow futures for instance on longter time frames, i use both. it's worked with XAU calls, YG...

as far as a "womans right to choose", i am repub and i am also prochoice it is the REPUBS that accept pro-choicers within their ranks the dems do not accept prolifers within theirs. so, your point is weak on that regards repub convention even had guiliani and arnold as key speakers...

to give some examples, I bot some AAPL Jan 57.5 calls yesterday and took some profit on 1/2 of them. they are up quite nicely. i am longterm bullish on aapl. i also bot some AAPL SSF's and sold 1/2 of those today when AAPL hit over 62 i have several SMH calls in various strikes and...

don't forget the "paleocons" i believe National Review coined that term, but could be wrong. they use it often enuf

this summer, I made some nice scalps off the QM (crude) YM correlation. Crude spikes, YM dips. Crude dips. YM spikes. it was pretty consistent of course, it is no longer a strong correlation. but for a couple of months it was good for several nice little scalps a week

i will readily admit i am not that sophisticated in my understanding of options however, i am reasonably profitable, so i must be doing something right i write options on stocks (naked puts) that i don't currently own, but want to own (usually a combination of fundamentals and technicals)...

look. a lot of the time, if you don't preenter a limit order @ price X, you can't get a fill @ price X. iow, there are a certain # of trades on the book @ price X. relatively often, a price will come down to Price X (and in the case of the long) maybe 1/2 or 2/3 of the limit buys at that...

the most simple edge? (i trade YM) NOT entering a trade unless the odds are greatly in my favor one huge advantage we have (as traders of index futures) over mutual funds etc. is the advantage of standing aside. also seen is the advantage of quickly getting in and out, which as an...

no, what i am looking for is intellectual honesty, something u are incapable of. when i am wrong, i admit so. you don't. it's called being an adult. it's also good for your p/l

i am not arguing with your "moral position". that is your opinion and more power to you. i am arguing with your misstatement of facts about how the civil rights movement happened/is happening. the FORMER is opinion. the latter is fact. the former is not refutable the latter is. if...

"There is no revision of my hypothesis. I have discussed many times in Chit Chat the difference in my mind between religion and spirituality." that's great. it's irrelevant to the statements you made, that i refuted and that u now refuse to acknowledge. "I don't consider religious dogma...

"My hypothesis was, and is that religious people (who are not practicing spirituality, i.e. acceptance and tolerance, and promoting human rights) are not good for our society when they get into the political field." that may be your (now revised) hypothesis, but it is not what u said.... i...

i repeat: here is what u said: "The deeply religious folks who were/are at the forefront of human rights for all, were/are not using the Bible or other religious doctrine to make their arguments." that is demonstrably false, and i have demonstrated how it is false you have yet to...

"No, I am not back peddling. It happens all the time that some people need clarification of a statement, which is apparently what you need, and what I am providing. " no, it happens all the time that people in support of an ill defined hypothesis/idea/etc. throw out false statements based on...

you are still backpedaling, changing the argument and using strawmen (cause you made a false statement that you are too cowardly to admit) let's replay... you said" "The deeply religious folks who were/are at the forefront of human rights for all, were/are not using the Bible or other...

care to respond to #2. you made the claim, and now you run from it. because i suspect you realize it was false. but in a kneejerk fashion, you introduced it to try to defend your point, which is rapidly fading as you realize it was false. hth

way to evade the point, zzzz here is what you said that i responded to "Religion doesn't promote freedom in this world, Judeo/Christian/Islam promotes freedom in the afterlife, and a bunch of social rules that restrict personal freedoms in this life" "The deeply religious folks who...