Search results

the dems don;'t see her (good for them) as the face of their party this can be seen in how the dems (smartly) did not stand behind her when she began her racist smearing of the capital police, and McKenna in particular with her absurd claims of racial profiling. democratic members of...

dude. defending carter is defending the indefensible it has nothing to do with partisanship, or the fact that i vote republican (mostly) i can agrre that clinton was a decent president. bush I was decent. imo, reagan was great. but carter was terrible

believing in the constitution means believing in the rights of those that you DISAGREE with , to spew. zzz clearly does not that's the fundamental tenet of the 1st - protection of speech and expression of ideas, no matter how unopopular, hateful or misguided those ideas may be

stu, i am relying on the constitution - you don';t incitement to riot is not constitutionally protected opinion is. as i cited, the scotus has made clear, as has common sense, that the fundamental tenet of the 1st amendment in regards to speech is that govt. and the constitution can...

Quote from whitster: i am "moaning" because religious groups are being banned from a public forum... in the US that would be unconstitional. in england, that's a-ok. that's bad. banning ANY group because of their belief system, from posting in a public forum goes against basic principles of...

------i said***: here's a QUOTE from the labour party website (capitalization emphasis mine)... i'd like an apology from you, since you are clearly wrong about the socialist aspects of the labour party. I will stand by to see if you have the intellectual honesty. Blair is labour party. the...

neither repubs or dems get it right when either party dominates BOTH the congress and the presidency, they tend to stink the place up something fierce it's that old "absolute power" thing

covertibility, you're all over the map. carter was a terrible president. bush, while flawed has not established the kind of suckiness that carter did. yes, bush's approval rating is abysmal. recall that not too long ago, his approval was high enough to win reelection. these things...

the only way any president can really be judged as to "worst" is with the proper historical perspective gained by... wait for it... HISTORY imo (and lots of others), carter was clearly the worst in recent memory carter is proof positive that smart and well meaning =/= effective...

http://www.cnn.com/video/player/player.html?url=/video/us/2006/04/23/starzyk.ga.mckinney.walks.out.affl&wm=10 nuff said. CLASSIC

lurv the stones, but please there is no way a political lightweight like mick jagger can 'savage' any president (or prime minister). i mean PUHLEEZE there are a scant few big name musicians out there who are not lightweights. Certainly, bono comes to mind but even Ginger Spice is more...

"agree that no one NEEDS a chart, but for you, and all you others out their that dont use charts...dont you feel left in the dark?..dont you feel people know things that you dont? for me? i never said *i* trade without charts. i use charts. on some INVESTMENTS where i am VERY certain of...

actually, it's the people who voted for nader. it's THEIR fault THANKS GUYS and btw, zzz... the point you were wrong on was the (among others) saudi airplane claim that is a debunked scam and i posted evidence thereof. hth

hmmm. zzz strangely silent. i wonder why

i'm still waiting for zzz's response. should be interesting...

while , from a tactical standpoint your post makes sense... personally, i prefer not wallow in excrement like a pig (the zzz.. philosophy) iow, i refuse to lower myself to his level while it might be effective, it would be too demeaning i'll take the higher ground i can respect many...

i note the lack of intellectual honesty i showed ample evidence of the socialist nature of the labor party the previous poster was in error, claiming i was wrong to point out the socialist nature of the labour party. i would expect some intellectual honesty. guess that's too much to...

bruce roools.

"Far left ? You have got to be joking. And what is a 'quasi socialist' anyway ? Where do you get this stuff from. Blair is hardly any different from some of the neocon nut cases in Washington in terms of foreign policy and has just the same authoritarian inclinations in domestic policy. He...

"you are moaning because there is a ban on any religious groups including Christians and other secular groups, from advertising in a library ultimately run by politicians, left right or whatever wing . But you want me to "get real" when Blair, a self proclaimed Christian who brought his God...