Search results

Jack, instead of all this obfuscating gobbledygook, why don't you just show me and everyone else what you're really made of in a real-time, public ET Trading contest? You already know that you trade and make money on a level I can't even comprehend and that I don't. So what do you have to...

It needs to be verifiable, not to mention everyone would need to use the same platform.

So I take it that's a "no"? That you won't trade against me in a real-time contest here on ET? Think of how you could showcase SCT!

Oddi, You weren't able to detect just a weeeeeeee bit of sarcasm in my post? Maybe when it got to the part about buying Microsoft (the entire company) and the English language? I agree that nobody will ever become a trillionaire from trading rockets -- even if they did work. But that was...

P.S. Here's an idea to change the character of the posts: A Reality ET Trading Contest! We could do this in an ET Journal that would track a real-time contest between the A and B Teams! I was thinking maybe three traders on each side to give more points of reference. A Team = Jack plus...

Hate to disappoint you but this is my one and only ET nic in the history of the universe. Apparently you don't know that old posts can be searched and read with ease? As for me "attacking" Jack, he BEGS for comments with his demeanor, writing style, wild unfounded claims, long internet...

That's NOT my creed but I get the impression from YOUR posts that you don't think there should be opposing views, which I addressed here: http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=1086395#post1086395

Jack BEGS for comments with his demeanor, writing style, wild unfounded claims, long internet history, etc. Someone living in a cardboard box on the street can access the internet from a public library and claim they're making 4% to 7% a day. So of course there will be opposing views. Last I...

The nail in the coffin? Let's see if I understand this... easyrider posted on a free internet forum that he turned $5,000 into $200,000 in two years and that proves something? Even though his posting history prior to that shows no indication of that kind of success? Has it ever occurred to...

"Those who 'know'?" LOL! Nwbprop may very well be a resounding success in Candy Land with you Hersheyettes, but he definitely wasn't successful in his efforts to trade the ES Hershey style.

Bruce Kovner said something to the effect that stops should be placed where, if hit, you'll be proved wrong. But what does he know? He never returned -24% in a trading contest like Jack Hershey did!

OK, let me get this straight. Your "methods" don't test out, therefore I'm "still in second form land?" LOL! You're the one who is stuck in second form land. For someone who claims to be so learned, your command of the English language sucks. "Sight" and "cite" are two different words...

Wow, I can see why Jack Hershey is the perfect guru for you!

Most traders who lacks the brainpower to "reduce thinks to scientific numbers" find comfort in dismissing objective, quantitative analysis for various reasons. But that only works on message boards. If you think MAE is "Guru Gospel," you're mistaken. It's not. It's just another metric...

You guys (Jack and the A Team) are the ones making the claims. I (and others) are simply calling you on them. Don't make claims if you don't want to be challenged. What I find morbidly fascinating is how people keep falling for Jack's game, even after all these years and the Usenet and ET...

Did you ever hear of MAE? Reading up on that may enlighten you.

No, it was 32 times.

Well that certainly PROVES you've made over 600% a year trading rockets. So you bought Photoshop with your welfare money?

So many bad words in one post! Why Jack, you naughty boy. You should be ashamed of yourself. If I were there I'd wash out your mouth with soap! You claim the most recent attempts to backtest your methods are f'ed up. What about the guys from Harvard who came up with air after trying for...

I noticed that right after I sent it and redid it, addressed correctly. Since you've made it public, I'll repeat here what it said. Basically that your reply to gerry875's post proved his point. So did this one.