Search results

I've often thought that one of the many things on Jack's agenda is to toss nebulous scraps of trading "wisdom" to minions, hoping that one of them will eventually discover something that really works. I've seen people spin their wheels with his stuff for years on Usenet.

You have 1801 posts and become more of a fool with each one, so I don't think there's a correlation.

My analyses of "rockets" and the "P,V Boolean relation" will be helpful to anyone with a brain who's thinking about burning a year studying the Jack Hershey Method, because a word to the wise is sufficient. Which obviously doesn't apply to you. So how did Jack demonstrate his competence? By...

Are you talking about bubba7/jack hershey/grob109 and the dream team?

The backtest was done on a method that had been ballyhooed as providing "tomorrow's paper today," using Spydie's latest scoring routine on 5000 stock-years of data. So what's not relevant? The fact that I didn't apply all the conditions that were written in hindsight on the document by the...

P.S. Why don't you and Jack take me on in a real-time trading contest here on ET? That's the best way to settle everything. No more going back and forth... just let the markets sort out who can trade and who can't.

Wow, apparently your puny brain has become so ravaged by grape kool-aid that you're incapable of even understanding English. So let me type more slowly... Buying the 0 to 7 shift of the "P,V Boolean relation" and exiting 5 days later produced abysmal results when tested on 1000 stocks over...

Why do you persist with your puny and laughable smoke screens? The analysis I did is a FACT, not an opinion, so you can't make it disappear with pixie dust. The P,V Boolean relation has been represented BY ITSELF on several occasions as a way to get "tomorrow's paper today" and I posted one...

Of course you're wrong yet again. And speaking of direct challenges, you fail to mention Jack's repeated evasions of my real-time trading contest challenges. Just think of how easy it would be to settle it all right here, on ET. Or is Jack afraid because in the past he finished dead last...

Thanks for yourRED HERRINGoffer but your attempt to obfuscate the real issue is puny and laughable. You're trying to hide a very important point: that the highly acclaimed 0 to 7 shift of the "P,V Boolean relation" is a bunch of Ballyhoo. Adding new conditions now, in hindsight, won't negate or...

Oh really? Well here's the same analysis over the same 5 year period, but this time with 1000 stocks (I also limited the maximum # of positions allowed at any one time to 100). I hereby declare your puny attempt to lend credibility to the P, V Boolean relation to be laughable!

To say these results are less than stellar would be an understatement. And I do realize that SCT is NOT about simply buying the 0 to 7 shift and exiting 5 days later. But wouldn't one expect that this type of test would show at least some positive effect? Especially since the "P,V Boolean...

It's been over six years since I last tested the "P,V Boolean relation," so I decided to take a look at how it's done since the year 2000. I analyzed 200 stocks from 2000 to 2005, a total of 1000 stock-years. I scored each stock from 0 to 7 each trading day using the methodology in...

Both of your neurons are drunk on grape kool-aid.

There's nothing intellectually deep about Grobian voodoo... but people with limited brainpower can easily confuse obfuscation with brilliance. So given these quotes of yours, it's no wonder why you believe what you do. "I contend that probability of success on any trade is 33.33%. So if a...

So does that mean that the highly acclaimed "P, V Boolean relation" is merely ballyhoo?

No answer to this either! http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=1104576#post1104576

I will concede that it does always work, except when it doesn't!

I beg to differ with you, my esteemed B Team colleague. Assuming Spydey's Journal is reality-based, I believe he's developed a feel for the markets and uses discretion to separate the wheat from the chaff, despite using Grobian screens as a starting point. I also have a theory that Jack...

Which assumptions are inaccurate and why?