Search results

Maybe... but it beats the crap out of your obsession with lying and pretending you're something that you're not. :eek:

You're WRONG because Jack does it all the time, but NOT with "entries and exits." He doesn't do "entries and exits." He's in the market all the time, making money all the time, with 750 contracts at once! And there's PROOF... just look on these pages, here on ET... it's all documented in black...

You might as well get a new identity here because this shines a spotlight on you as an ignorant liar... who doesn't even know enough about trading to fabricate believable lies! Not that any or your other posts make sense... just a thought! :)

Expand my horizons by opening my mind to Grobean voodoo and Boolean ballyhoo? So that I, too, can become a living contradiction? And get to drink kool-aid every day? Thanks but I'll leave that to you guys! P.S. I hope I do provide motivation for parishioners in the First Internet Church...

Here we go again. Attached is Jack's document, "Catch Up with Tomorrow's Paper Today -- Technical Analysis Used in a Manner to Anticipate the Market" (SIDE NOTE: Since this is the "prediction thread," funny how this title reeks of prediction while all Grobeans vehemently deny predicting) In...

If you're so certain, then start a hedge fund and put that delusional garbage in your literature and call me and tell me how it's working for you.

Really? Then tell me how you learned what the "correct action" is for a given circumstance? Answer: from observing the PAST, and seeing what the market HAS DONE under certain circumstances. And when you place a trade, you do so because you see a circumstance similar to one you've seen in the...

I'm saying things that were never said? LOL!!!! Here are your own words and here's the link to them: For those having difficulty with Anticipation vs Prediction, please review this post. Continuation vs change are not tied to 'odds of success' in the future. Reaching the correct conclusion...

Here's my original quote: I tested the "0 to 7 turn" on many portfolios... randomly selected, S&P stocks, etc. And here's what it means: I tested the "0 to 7 turn" on many portfolios... randomly selected (portfolios), S&P stocks, etc.(meaning other portfolios too) Had I meant "randomly...

You're right about one thing, for YOU this is not about semantics... it's about pretending that one can KNOW the future, if only one monitors the "correct" data... and I suppose you (and Jack) want newbies to believe that you can teach them how to do just that? You said you linked to my post...

Thanks for all the compliments but you missed the point of my post. Here's what I meant with my table: If Jack's current market position is LONG, then his conclusion of CONTINUE (made NOW, in the present) = a PREDICTION that the market will rise in the FUTURE. If Jack's current market...

Golden ratio?!?! More like a golden shower!!! Methinks we're getting hosed with phoney claims of Grobean profitability.

All you've done in this post is show that you're making the following predictions, while playing semantic games to pretend that you're not. A turd is a turd, no matter what you call it. POSITION......CONCLUSION.....PREDICTION Long.............Continue..........Market will rise...

That's not what I wrote! Do you know what a comma means? You have serious reading comprehension issues for a native speaker. I know for a fact that there are plenty of patterns that DO test out profitably over the same portfolios and timeframes I tested the "0 to 7 turn" on, WITHOUT adding...

MAK, are you a native speaker? Serious question... all BS aside. I tested the "0 to 7 turn" on many portfolios... randomly selected, S&P stocks, etc. It was never my intent to sabotage the results. It was my intent to find something robust enough to give an edge on almost any large group...

You don't actually believe he trades 750 contracts at a time, do you?

Do your indicators predict greener pastures elsewhere?

If you're modeling RISK (and you said you are), you're FORECASTING. Spinning it differently doesn't change reality. Speaking of reality, I doubt you evaluate ALL possible scenarios. I have no idea why you keep repeating "that document has nothing to do with the CREDIT world, " and "it...

Hypostomus, I serve with Jack Hershey on ET. I've read the writings of Jack Hershey. Jack Hershey is NOT a friend of mine. Hypostomus, you're no Jack Hershey.

Jack, you truly are the Maestro of the Markets! NOT!