Search results

Who said I wasn't? Nothing Grobean though.

I've only tested "rockets" and the "P,V Boolean relation" on stocks. I chose these two because both were clearly described AND highly touted. My testing was extensive and found no edge in either. I doubt I'd do any testing in ES even if I did find something clearly enough described to...

If you review my posts, you'll find more than enough info for anyone with motivation and a brain to see what I did and replicate it for themselves. As for my credibility, I couldn't care less what kooks like you think and am always amused with their disagreement. Given the other views you've...

Because you're his relative (and he knows you), I'm sure you have ZERO credibility with him and he can't stand you either. Not to mention that the last thing someone with cancer wants to hear is silly drivel from a know-it-all lunatic who's advocating the equivalent of Flintstones Children's...

"Big Medicine?" So I suppose there's a conspiracy for "Big Medicine" to kill as many cancer patients as possible with conventional treatments because that process extracts the greatest amount of money from them? Please share the cure for cancer with us. Flintstones Children's...

I have done my due diligence and you're talking out of your butt about that just as you were in your last few posts... nothing of Jack's that I've tested has ever shown even the slightest edge. I defy you or anyone else to show me something of Jack's that is quantifiable and does give an edge.

Really? Which is more likely? That Jack truly is the market wizard he claims to be and generously dispenses his wisdom in thousands of posts on ET from his computers with CRT monitors in Liz's basement without ever showing a shred of proof of his flatulent boasts? Or that it's all a bunch of...

Nice try for someone of your puny intellect! Unfortunately for you, your attempts to please your master, Jack, are laughably obvious. Why don't you go post more lies about your "trading?" Looks like you need to boost your ego in your own mind.

Tdog, the nice approach won't work. Neither will being combative, or anything inbetween. Because there is no trading record to prove Jack's flatulent boasts. Never was, never will be.

I know you're too immature and dimwitted to understand this now but maybe some day when you grow up or get an education you might, so... by fabricating trades to prop up your own ego AND support someone who's played pied piper for 10 years, you're a HUGE loser on not just one but multiple...

Sure you're defending Jack, by attempting to change the subject... typical misdirection tactic. Do you do it because you know how it feels to have your phoney trading claims questioned? I'm a loser? This from the guy who can't trade in real life so he logs onto the internet and pretends he...

No moron, I haven't been "argueing" with Jack for 10 years, he's been playing pied piper for 10 years. But you're ignorant so I wouldn't expect you to pick that up. Where does that place you on the top loser list of all time, as someone who's defending such a person?

That's the bottom line right there... this has been going on for almost 10 years that I'm aware of and I predict it's not going to change.

What is TYPICAL is that neither Jack nor his toady apologists will directly address the facts... instead they change the subject (as you did here), fail to answer at all, or attempt some other pathetic form of obfuscation. LOL!!!!

Jack claims he trades 750 cars at a time, is always in the market, and is using "pool extraction" to achieve results others describe as "unbelievable" and "astonishing." Accordingly, one would think there would be plenty of recent documentation. The fact that you chose to post a questionable...

Damn right! I've watched Jack BS people on the internet for almost 10 years now. If he's even one zillionth the market wizard that he claims to be, there should be a lot more "proof" than a TWO HOUR "TRACK RECORD" FROM THREE YEARS AGO!

Do you mean the P&L for Jack's TWO HOUR TRACK RECORD FROM THREE YEARS AGO? ROTFLMAO!!!!!!!

You're kidding, right? Jack has dissed just about everyone who IS real as the "conventional orthodoxy," and has made the most empty, pompous and flatulent boasts of his alleged trading accumen as if he's superior, and you post a few two-bit trades from 3 years ago as "proof?" Trades that...

Lots of good points! But I think Jack's empty, pompous claims are better described as flatulent boasts.

Proof? None necessary, it's self-evident. Barring a system that never loses because it never trades, a "zero loss system" cannot exist, not even in theory (on this planet anyway). Reason is there are way too many factors that go into price or can go into price for any one trader to ever get a...