Search results

Tomorrow is "Fed Day" so we may have a quiet day today despite today's good PPI report Doug

She was fun and funny. She is a helluva lot better than the current pretty boy, Tom Delay hand maiden, gov TX now has. DS

I don't use the method you refer to; I use MacroExpress to do this. I posted links to these methods in: http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=1166300&highlight=macroexpress#post1166300 These links take you to Tradestation World where they are discussed. Hope this...

That one was fun. Too bad it was last day b4 Labor Day or I would have bought more. I exited shortly b4 the close as it looked to me like a short squeeze. OTOH, they announced today that their full FY earnings will be announced next Friday. So, it may not have been a short squeeze but...

Surprised you didn't mention Acts 1:15, "1:15 And in those days Peter stood up in the midst of the disciples, and said, (the number of names together were about an hundred and twenty,)" Was it 500 or 120????????????????????? Why is there no agreement?????? Seneca

There is a simpler solution: let prices rise and let the market take over. And, to help it along, why not increase gasoline taxes to $0.50 per gallon to fund better mass transportation and research other fuels such as alcohol from celulose. DS

That did it; thank you. Doug

Second the complement; very nicely put together. It is very nice of you to do this for us. For some reaon, I can not get quotes to work. I have a list of stocks in "securties ALL", right click and select "update quotes", and see the progress meter. But when I go to the "Quotes" tab...

Macroexpress is software that automates macros and works well with TS. A free evaluation copy is available from: http://www.macros.com/index.htm I don't recall needing a dll to do this. Read Bamboo's post at: https://www.tradestation.com/Discussions/Topic.aspx?Topic_ID=31616 It...

Take a look at the permitting process. As I understand it, unless the govt intervenes there are no new sites, only where they now stand. DS

But GE, who if I recall correctly would be a big winner if nuke building resumes, also have lots of money and lobbyists and can influence govt as well as Exxon and the others. DS

vladn, are any of these in operation commercially? DS

I do this often using MacroExpress. There are a few threads at Tradestation world that explain how to do the testing using this and also other ways using TS alone. This is one of the threads and a good place to start: https://www.tradestation.com/Discussions/Topic.aspx?Topic_ID=41468...

If I recall the French have no fossil fuels and they got hurt badly during the first oil shock in the mid 70s. As a result, they went nuclear for almost all their electric. Now, most people there accept it. They are having nimby problems with waste disposal also. BP apparently is poorly...

I recently switched for satelllite to TWC (hated doing that as TW sucks in many ways) but did so as you found out because of the local HD issue. AFAIK they have some bandwidth issues also .

Not really, 1. nukes are very expensive to build and when the cost of disposing of the waste fuel and decommisioning costs are factored in become about the same or more expensive than conventional plants. Some recent estimates by groups that favor their construction show better economics but...

If you charge, you are in fact an investment advisor are you not and may be subject to SEC or state regs. Where I live, you only need one client to be subjected to the regs. DS

Shows the depth and breadth of his research and thought processes. Or maybe the Inuits moved south and we didn't get the memo.

Or read about the "year without a summer" in 1816 caused by the largest volcanic eruption in recorded history, Mt. Tambora. DS

Not sure what your point is re. my post. My post stated that I thought SCIENTISTS during the winter of 75-76 were predicting the next ice age was upon us. It was not the republikans doing the predicting then. So are you comparing scientists to republikans? DS