Search results

well Im saying it from the point of view of insurgents, freedom fighters, patriots what ever you call them, they are treating the people who are helping the US as traitors. And like the american government would say the children, could be consider a casualty of war. If the russians invaded the...

well during the american revolution, the so called patriots attacked and killed innocent americans who were still loyalists. do you say that the founding fathers are murderers. Or were they attacking the enemy because they were helping the oppresssors. We call those people traitors. And what...

do you mean that hitler and the other nazis were wrongfully accuse of genocide? B/c that was fairgame to right. The jews were persieved traitors and should have gotten what they deserve right?

lol reg b/c you want the oil :D...if there wasnt any oil there, why would you care. You cant nuke, you cant invade, but you care lot b/c they could invade any of your other oil friends to. Look at north korea. It has no oil, and it builds a nuke. And you have everybody going, who cares. If...

Ok I was wondering, why do american's, especially their soldiers think that using IED's are cowardly and unsportsman like? Americans complain that they never get to see their enemy because the insurgents leave their bombs and set them from a distance. However, doesnt americans do the same...

umm walther, if you have 200 bodies found in bagdad alone on some days, and bagdad is suposivly one of the saftest cities in iraq, it easily goes above 100K dead in iraq. And look how you say its only 65K dead iraqis as its still ok. If 65 K americans died in iraq, you would have outrage...

lol longhorn, b/c that was your reason you invaded iraq. To stop them from getting wmds. Ok north korea now has wmds, so invade them. Send in the 4th and 5th fleet. Start a draft. Why if not wmds did you invade a soverign country. If it wasnt wmds then what?

lol then we would just have to put IEDs under yoru trucks then. I cant belieave you guys are being defeated by the crudest of devices. LOL drmarkan you seemed tobe worried hopefully your not in the 18-60 range for qualified drafties :D

lol thats called a nuclear bomb....lol yeah you want to use a nuke on north korea. That would be like china bombing mexico, and not expecting a nuclear response from the us. some common sense please.

lol, using bombs, no way. Never works. To garanteed that its done you have to send boots on the ground. Which means a draft. LOL all the conservatives now have to give away their first borns for the cause :D...isnt that biblical justice :D

We all know president bush is now itching for an invasion of north korea. And to all the geniuses on ET who think bombing can only do it, you can only look at the latest isreali war. No it cannot. anybody with alittle bit of military knowledge will tell you the only way to garanteed something...

losama bin ladin said he would strike at the heart of the US, he did, it was called 911, hitler said he would take over europe, he did :D

dow jones, and cnn are both reporting that south korean government, and now even the north korean government are saying they have indeed tested a successful nuke :D time for another war baby, two front.

so there you go. According to the bush doctrine and why you even went to war in iraq, you have to invade north korea now. They have nukes. No if or buts, they exploded a nuke. Time for a draft.

lol if you nuke nkorea, the chinese would consider that an act of war, and they would nuke you. It would be like them nuking mexico. 11111

UMMM didnt you bomb and invade iraq to stop wmd's. That was the point right...no wait it was for nation building....no wait it was for stopping terriosts....no wait now its wmd's and nation building. come on are you afraid of asians?

drmarkan,in southern united states during the early 60's blacks were not allowed to walk into any bathroom,any store, and attend any school they want, regardless of race. That in the 1960's if a blackman in southern states whistled at a white woman, there wouldnt be dire consequences. In fact...

point exactly captain. So if blacks would fight an invading army, why shouldnt the iraqi fight americans. Why do you still call them terriosts. They are freedom fighters.

ummmm yeah if you were white drmakan, nothing was wrong. And everything was leave it to beaver. The united states was as worse or worser, then iraq for most african americans. And yes it was government sanctioned. Segragation, lynching, beating of blacks, was all sanctioned. In fact, during...

If the russians invaded the US in the 1960's to free the blacks from segragation and terriosm caused by KKK and the racists in the south, wouldnt they be treated as liberators. Its the same reasoning that bush used to invade iraq. Free iraq from a dictator. Blacks were treated even more...