Search results

  1. R

    Sanity check. Can CME fill stop market at better price.

    You should get less slippage with a native stop. Not sure you'll end up bettering the trigger price though.. :p
  2. R

    What really happened with BATS execution?

    If there's not a lot of strength on the bid side, then why would anyone post there? Just wait, and buy later, at a lower price. ... If there's no interest in a product at a store, come back later when it's on sale. No conspiracy.
  3. R

    What really happened with BATS execution?

    If the market sell order was bigger than all the buy limit orders in all books, then yes. This is not rocket science. Edit: Strictly speaking, the last trade would be at whatever the limit price of the last bid consumed was. So not actually 0.
  4. R

    What really happened with BATS execution?

    Someone wanted to sell first, sell at any price, and didn’t care which market.
  5. R

    What really happened with BATS execution?

    Any large order can move price without circuit-breaker logic. It all depends on the liquidity on the other side.
  6. R

    Smallcaps only

    Never mind, and apologies for interrupting your thread. Good luck with the small caps :)
  7. R

    Smallcaps only

    To spell it out .. Your assumption is wrong. The typically wider spread earned in small caps makes up for the lower volume.
  8. R

    Best book on technical analysis for beginners

    +1 Once more: "Do you think hedge funds and professionals use TA? The answer is NO."
  9. R

    Smallcaps only

    To rephrase: you may have overlooked the spread earned vs the volume foregone.
  10. R

    Smallcaps only

    bzzzz .. wrong answer.
  11. R

    What really happened with BATS execution?

    I don't follow their analysis. If I send an ISO, I want to consume liquidly from all markets irrespective of best price. No fancy routing algos involved. Nanex is saying the only liquidity was on BATS. So any order would have arrived at BATS anyway.
  12. R

    What really happened with BATS execution?

    If there's a gap in the book, then sell through what's above it, to buy back below it. This is not fkn rocket science ... :confused:
  13. R

    What really happened with BATS execution?

    I think you're overestimating the complexity, and adding too much conspiracy. Route to somewhere less liquid, and it takes less volume to have more impact.
  14. R

    “Goldman Sachs the Pillage People” is holding its Annual Board Meeting in India

    Wow. Now they can build board meetings in India. Cool. Some ops manager just made his numbers.
  15. R

    Worldwide Banking Resignations Triple: Why Now?

    More upside on the outside than the inside.
  16. R

    What are algos actually doing?

    +1 Someone "gets it" :cool:
  17. R

    What are algos actually doing?

    How will this not get killed in a trend?
  18. R

    What are algos actually doing?

    Care to comment on exactly how this is the case?
  19. R

    What are algos actually doing?

    I like your thinking bowo, but it's a bit harder than that :p For example: When do you want to be quoting BBO, and when do you want to favour one side over the other, & back off a tick or so? How likely is it you will be run over by a big dumb market order, consuming several price...
  20. R

    Interactive Brokers TWS Bug Thread

    def, thanks for following up. I like that IB sorts out the important stuff. :)
Back
Top