Search results

200 dma at 1430+ on spx...

or perhaps it's the obama crash?

not that it matters but...was there news?

I love pointless ping-pong among posters. And meaningless alliteration, for that matter. But I digress...

i have yesterday's close at 86.00 no fill yet...am i mistaken?

yes, indeed. you've actually sparked something in my tortoise-brain re: systemized management of rule-of-ten signals. i'll post something later so you can blast it shreds...:p

that's a very helpful explanation, actually. thanks...

Here's what I don't get about the rule of 10 --- under this logic, one would now be short at 1395 or so. Anyone short at 1395 or so???

If TradeStation doesn't feel the need to defend its own copyrights, why should you or I care? Their silence implies their consent.

will someone please explain this day?

who cares?

1398 coincides, roughly, with the feb high on the cash. but do we care?

why 95?

Wouldn't you say that today's short squeeze potential is rather high?

old wives tales without foundation in peer-reviewed literature

Why 47? R2? (short, i presume?)

44.50 level sits roughly between 20 and 50 dma on spx, plus what one might contend is a reasonably significant fib level (61.8 retrace of feb high to march low)...and, gee, is that a rule of 10 short to Monday's high value area of 1334?

truer words have never been written...

since when has the empire state manufacturing survey been a market mover?

I know a guy who swears by Ritalin.