Search results

It's pretty obvious they could care less about a pregnancy, or childbirth, or life for that matter. Case in point... The majority of homosexuals support/believe homosexuality is normal/natural behavior. The majority of homosexuals claim to be non-believers... Which means they believe the...

i would tend to agree. its your business if you do not want to believe in God. people believe all kinds of crazy shit. but when you try to force laws be made and schools teach based on science that has NOT been proven we have a problem. thinking people will challenge you. We Have A...

Thanks for your reply PO. I use IB as well and have no probs logging in with my old subscription code/settings...just thought about downloading the patch if it will enable me to get more than the standard five days of intraday data via IB. Once again, thanks.

Does the 60 days on intraday charts apply regardless of which quote source I use? On another note... Just want to say this to you j_medved and whoever you might have had helping you develope Quotetracker... I've been a long time subscriber and it will be a sad day for me if/when they let it...

FT, Same can be said conscerning atheism as well.

Stu, Although there is much that is similar in the organizational character of species, each species' DNA is different: man, animals, birds, reptiles, fish. I know you realize that. We can even go as far to say that science proves that all living things DNA share some of the same molecules as...

Indeed we can, FT! So... couple of questions. 1)If you have, let's say, a pet parakeet/chicken/other bird... what part of it's DNA shows it evolved from reptiles? =birds evolved from dinosaurs 2)If you have had your DNA tested lately... what breed of ape/monkey did it show your...

kts, the quote below is from my first post on this thread. Can you or anybody else honestly answer the question and prove it. (produce sufficient evidence that will eliminate any other explanation) An example of proof would be a fossil with a partly formed wing(s) or leg(s). If you can you...

In math's case, when the correct theory is discovered/applied the problem in question can then be solved/proven. Evolutionist have not honestly proven anything. A good example is how math is used to determine the age of the earth. Despite what people have been led to believe, there are no...

Well, at least this much of your post is correct and provable. NOT the same for evolution. Evolutionist themselves are constantly having to change their theories because someone else comes up with another theory that makes the previous one look stupid! Don't get me wrong stu...I'm not...

A very good point, stu. To answer the question...Yes. I would be constantly questioning math itself if, everytime I turned around someone proved that the formulas or methods used were flawed and produced wrong answers. Same goes for evolution. rc

Good question and very relevant point. No, byteme, I can't. I'm pretty much in agreement with the points made on the websites that I gave links to.(other sources as well) In short, I believe some of the earliest fossils mentioned are a different kind of animal from the horse altogether. Some...

I have researched the claims the link you provide make. That theory was proven wrong 40 or 50 years ago! Don't just take my word for it. Check it out for yourself. GOOGLE "horse evolution proven wrong", or "horse evolution false", or "horse evolution fraud". Or, check these links out...

So you aren't even going to try? You may be right, I may not understand your answer, but, someone else might. I understand this much...you evidently don't know either! So, I'm not necessarily directing this question to you, stu. How about it... anybody??? My first question in the first...

I may be wrong on this but, if anyone has solid proof/evidence on this (no theories/hypothosis/claims) I would like to know about it. It seems to me if evolution occurred by slow, minute changes in living creatures, over millions of years, there would be thousands of times more transitional...

I may be wrong on this but, if anyone has solid proof/evidence on this (no theories/hypothosis/claims) I would like to know about it. It seems to me if evolution occurred by slow, minute changes in living creatures, over millions of years, there would be thousands of times more transitional...

Just trying to simplify it for you. My first question is pretty straightforward and nowhere did I even mention the word MAN.

Wrong. EDIT... I'm not necessarily asking about man (as we now exist) in particular. I'm asking about the things that existed before the life that exists as we now know it.:D

Which evolved first and HOW did it work without the others, and HOW LONG did it work without the others? The digestive system, the food to be digested, the appetite, the ability to find and eat the food, the digestive juices, or the body’s resistance to its own digestive juice (stomach...

Scientific evidence is reliable. How some choose to interpret the evidence... not so reliable. EDIT... For BOTH sides that is.