Search results

I asked a legitimate question and you responded with a useless response; Grade F.

they also say those that cannot do teach

useless; no dates, number of executions - just numbers on a page.

Can you point me in the direction of performance data (or an excuse why not)?

Can you point me in the direction of performance data (or an excuse why not)?

how is best defined and measured and over what time frame?

what about manhole cover, manslaughter and manual?

and the all powerful fruit loops

Oh please - nothing more than Socratic method and Boolean logic rolled into one. 100% redundant. And to presume it is new- pure hubris.

thank you

Impressive, so if it is not vol or price data, what is it?

Excellent, so what data do your indicators run on?

Since all indicators run on the same data, when you say "There's nothing else like them out there!" - how is that?

with the understanding that Nature Aging is a rag journal and there are no prospective clinical trials of efficacy or Alzheimer’s reduction

I do not know: I see no trade data or performance stats, only blinking lights and vaudevillian tactics, heck - they list shows - who does that! Calls himself Bitcoin Jesus - what hubris!

A colleague of mine is writing a comparative review on such companies - I will pass along your observations and experiences.

silly trader: those are dangling modifiers: sell low (how low? How is low defined and measured?)/buy lower (lower than what?). Useless.

So at 4,962 words, zero quantitation, zero performance, and zero validation, can you provide a Cliff notes version that gets rid of sloppy subjective in favor of objective in 100 works or less?

THE FIVE SEXES https://nyaspubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/j.2326-1951.1993.tb03081.x

You missed the entire point, only to come up with a trite mistaken quip?