Search results

Games? What has offended you? I don't mind doing as you suggested, and I doubt anyone else does either. As to whether "properly annotated" charts were provided during my mentoring... I DON'T KNOW. That's why I'm here. The understanding I've ended up with is decent in various areas, but I suspect...

As far as what we have the past 2 days, that's why I asked for a chart. I'd like to see what you've defined, because it may resonate with me & help me decipher my shortcomings. I don't know exactly what you call a Tape vs what I call a Tape. Mine has to either be 1 container that has Pace...

Mon & Tue, June 15th & 16th: nice example of a run-on tape (or so i think). Heroic, would you mind posting an annotated chart for those 2 days? Or anyone who has a firm enough grasp of Heroic's method usage. I suspect that'll reduce my questions. I have enough of a basis that, at that point...

Thanks for the reply. Sorry for lack of gaussians, I do understand nesting fractals and the how/why of it. My initial question was just about one section of TLs, but I should have included gaussians anyway. I think I can learn some helpful things here. The mentoring I received might not have...

In my chart image, the steepest thin fast TLs are the 'purple' ones, and the thin slower ones that VE are the ones we're referring to as teal.

lol Teal is green/turquoise looking and purple is pink looking. On my monitor they look turquoise & pink. Is that the color blindness thing, or maybe it's your monitor. ;)

Heroic, in thinking some more on your reply, I'm wondering if what we're annotating in real time as the fastest thing we're tracking as the teal container, and we VE it twice... why would we draw the purple TLs? The VE signaled us to do so, to define a sub-fractal to what was previously our...

Ditto, feel free to post things that're different. Whatever you're clear on, feel free to post it. No harm in that, and someone might benefit.

No worries. What do you call a Tape, generally? I don't mean how to draw it, but what is it composed of? The reason I'm asking is because I am able to understand most anything that we might discuss (as far as I know), due to my studies & having been mentored on this method, but my questions are...

Thanks. On that note, since we may not require literal IV and in the case of a VE ending all we "need" is implied IV... what about when we get more than 'needed'? Often we will get literal IV even on a VE ending. Meaning, we'll get some continuation after the VE. In real-time, what tells us...

No prob, thanks. I saw the thin lines for your bbt1 & bbt2 but didn't see them for bbt3. Actually, I did see thin red line from the top of bar 4 but it slices through both bars 7 & 8 which means that TL couldn't be bbt2 so it must've been something else. I'm only asking so as to see if my...

I saw that but not sure what your conclusion was as far as which bars are your BBT2? Or were you saying yesterday (looking at your image right now) that your container is promoted to a Tape w/out needing 3 BBTs?

midtown, I was thinking bars 11 forward comprised BBT2 & BBT3, were you thinking the same? I didn't think we had a way to see it otherwise, but maybe was mistaken. In real time, of course, this stuff is extremely important so that we aren't constantly wondering which of multiple options for...

Thanks, yes any tidbit can help. The sentence I quoted is the gist of what gives me issues. It happen a lot. Completed sequences (over & over) and on more than one occasion it's accompanied by a reasonable SOC (and FTT of course) that induces a reversal trade entry, only to subsequently fail &...

Understood, but aren't bars 11-15 the BBT2 of the tape? If yes, that means you don't require a BBT to FTT? Do you require 3 BBTs or just a vol cycle for the definition of a Tape you're using? I'm just trying to make sure we aren't discussing different things, as some basic building block...

Thanks. Edit: Which bars are the bbt2 of your black up tape? Or do you not require 3 bbts within a tape and as long as you have a vol sequence it's a tape for you?

I see that, but if you mean the whole up tape as b2b2r2b, the b2b is within the prior tape's RTL. No issue with that? And what about containers for the up tape, don't care... you only see the need for b2b2r2b, don't need 3 BBTs for the up tape, each having its own FTT?

Thanks, I think I see what you mean. Maybe we can compare notes via PMs also. But bars 11-15 I don't see a FTT, which is BBT2 of your up tape, right? Bar 15 looks like a VE (it touches the BBT2 LTL, doesn't it?) You require 3 BBTs to form a Tape, I assume, and each BBT has to FTT. So, it looks...

Heroic, couple questions for you: VEs and trendlines, acceleration vs not. Context for my questions... when a bar is a VE and the close of the VE bar isn't outside the existing RTL and also not on incr vol, you (and all of us) will clone the existing LTL and attach it to the bar that VE'd...

Hi midtown, in your Tape2, the BBT2 doesn't look like it FTTs. Does it? It looks like it ends on a VE. If so, that might mean it's demoted & your Tape1, Tape2 & Tape3 are all just Tape1. I purposely didn't look at my charts b/c I wanted to take this thing as it is w/out foresight benefit...