Search results

1000, dude ... you can't stay on point. The videos were posted for ONE reason: To demonstrate that your explosion timing assertion is incorrect. It was incorrect when you made it. It is incorrect now. It will remain incorrect. It matters not whether the twins were a different height...

Interesting -- I'd like to hear his reasoning. It's a guess here, but perhaps it's simply a vote to protest using that forum to make points rather than achieve something of substance. Again, just a guess. JB

Volente 00, I'm still waiting for you to go somewhere with your question and my answer. http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=1873805&highlight#post1873805 Keep me posted. JB

1000, here was your "water bag" assertion: ********************************** With explosive demolition, in an urban environment, the explosives have to be surrounded by water-filled bags. The amount of water required to cause an explosives blast inwards into the Towers' structure, would...

1000: >Thanks turok, so you have proved that it could never >have been an explosives demo job I don't hold the belief that I have "proven" anything of the sort. I just wanted it noted that your assertion is simply not true. Your assertion: "when using explosives for demolision, there...

Rat: >i've read theories on how it could have been done.. How do the theories you've read address the key items in this post? http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=1874921&highlightnote#post1874921 JB

You are aware aren't you that the above is not a replacement for the countless holes and mile of wire *inside* the blast zone, but rather a way to wirelessly and remotely set off the blast sequence from afar. The options to the above wireless device are to run "lead in" wiring (this is noted...

TG: >Hundreds of people ran miles of wire and placed >thousands of pounds of explosives in all these buildings, Yep, it's funny how the CT'rs never want to tangle with a post like this: http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=1874921&highlightnote#post1874921 I'd be...

From an earlier 1000 post 1000: >1. when using explosives for demolision, there is a >simultaneous setting off of all explosives. Not even close to being true. This is as bogus as the "water bag" myth. IN FACT, *controlled* demo *requires a careful timing of the different charges to...

Rat: >it was 100% a controlled demo... the only ones >arguing are those that are scared to death where >that leads us to. And you know this how? JB

Rat: >as soon as you master the quote function we will >take up this next. Apparently you haven't seem my response to your "retarded" post. LOL Go back and you'll see who the retarded one is. JB

So, moving on to the insulation issue: Please show me where I EVEN IMPLIED that "jets knocked off the insulation in bldg 7". Go ahead ... do your best. JB

Rat: >first of all .. learn to use the quote function you >fucking jack off. are you retarded? What's retarded is claiming someone needs to learn to use the quote function when they've used it to respond to you ON THIS VERY THREAD...

Rat: >look.. you said you worked on a demo project... Ahhh ... now you finally state the truth. I DID say I worked on a demo project -- but I didn't say I worked for a demo contractor. Now that we're making progress on the issue of your reading comprehension, we'll move to the next...

Rat: >if you were on the project you should know what >the hell a demo looks like when they pull a bldg. Not that it's relevent, but I happened to be on the roof of the adjacent building next to Mark when he pressed the button so I have a pretty good idea what the hell a demo looks like...

And Rat, while we're on the YOU CAN'T READ subject: Rat: >so the jets knocked off the insulation in bldg 7 Please show me where I EVEN IMPLIED that "jets knocked off the insulation in bldg 7". JB

Rat: >i never said you did the physical work. are you nutz? That's right, you never said that and I never said you did -- let's try to stay on point here ... This IS what you said: Rat: >seriously... you didn't work for a demo company.. >unless you were a secretary. And I...

Me: >Did you find where I said I work for a demo contractor yet? Rat: >yes i did.. LOL No you didn't you lying sack of S*** Following is the only thing you possibly found and NOWHERE does it even imply that I worked for a demo contractor, in fact it states that THEY WORKED FOR ME...

How many modern bldgs have the fire insulation (which protects the beams from such expansion) knocked off from impact before set on fire. Name one. C'mon ... just one. You seem to overlook the simplest details such as the above. JB

Rat: >yeah.. the pressure tunneled forty floors and >then out the window... "tunneled"? -- It follows the path of least resistance. >couldnt go out before that? Again, you don't read apparently -- you must have missed the part regarding which doors on which floors are open. The...