Search results

I've been reading and rereading quite a few of your posts in this thread and apart from enjoying the somewhat philosophical discussions I don't really get it. An intuition amplifier (IA) is used to ... what? Enhance decision making based on intuition? How would you even begin to measure that (ie...

Yes, and thanks for the thorough response.

MAESTRO, thank you for an interesting thread. It seems you are well known to most people here but as I am quite ignorant on almost everything in the ET "Who's who", I need to ask -- Are you a trader? Are you a scientist, a software developer, vendor, none of the above or all? I've read...

Baron, thanks for switching back to the original. When you move ahead... whatever happened to iterative/incremental development and rollout? Predictable, stable and much simpler than a big bang deployment... imho. :)

... because Surf is fooled by randomness? :p :D

Thanks for the reply.

How do you programmatically decide that you were in a trend and that it has now ended so that you can start counting (again)? Thanks, T

Surf, you are jumping to conclusions. That is not what CF wrote and once again you avoided to answer a simple question. I must say this journal is rather amusing to read, thanks for keeping it going :p .

"Technically, shares have been uptrending since Nov. 15, 2012, but have hit resistance in the mid $22 range. There is a massive double-top formation at this level on the daily chart. This creates a daily breakout close opportunity. Entering a long trade when price closes above $23 makes...

Volume? :p :D

:p :p :p

Oh c'mon. Not a turtle. A bird.

You're discussing your own journal and posts now? :p

:p Made my day, thanks. :D

Interesting that one of your trading heroes is also one of the first to publish studies on how and when to trade price patterns. Just like Cornix and NoDoji does. He also documented the ORB, another entry strategy ridiculed in this thread. His book (Day Trading With Short Term Price Patterns...

Are you serious? You post 3 links to 3 different articles where each author test the impact on 1 system, and at least one of them just being "theoretical", and think you can generalize that result to "any" system? Sheesh. All you can say is that it might be true for the 3 different systems...

Utterly rubbish. You must know the wrong people. Why would a stop loss degrade system performance?

LOL :p

It's still kind of interesting when someone tells you that what you know is true isn't so. Like "no, that's not green, it's red". Curious as to why.