Search results

the problem with this kind of insurance is that if there is no risk there is no need for bond insurance. high risk bonds should get higher interest rates. the idiots insuring bonds is a oxymoron. bonds are suppose to be no risk if you are only getting 10%

FED and brokers are buying back the securities from investors.

the funds hit a perfect storm. who would have predicted that there would be NO market for the securities. so you are holding unmarketable long the long position. and take 10 years just to breakeven the short well the insurers went bust. lose on both long and short.

in the 80's they had all these anti-war protest and anti-nuke protest now everybody wants to invade and nuke Iraq...is their something wrong with this,,,,and these assholes complain about high oil prices.....US dollar crashing...

the downfall of the US economy as a result from unsustainable war debt, gov't debt can bring down all it's trading partners down with it. war is the fastest and biggest destoyer of wealth...pray for peace. war is very expensive and has NO budget.

100 billion lost in bad real estate loans is HUGE. banks won't get the money back for the next 10 years FED holding the bag.

they want the housing speculators or real estate to use some of their own money for the risky profit. 25% down. the guy lending the money want some of the profit. 20% cut of the profit at least.

funds do a wonderful job of convincing public that they need a professional to manage their money for a fee producing 5% ananual returns. some private hedge funds make 50% so the need for gov't regulations in fees is ridiculous. people who buy some funds like balance funds making 5%...

unless you are professional, you are 'unemployed' so unless you are making money consistently for 6 months or one year 'consistently' you are not a professional. it's a game. it's not a real job or real business. really it isn't you can lose it all later on. so declaring it weekly is...