Search results

Things may be clearing up by themselves as I continue through my 100's PC Matrix. Here is the last part of the sequence beginning by 21, until 29. Later in the day or tomorrow, I will post clearly the questions that remain and cause my troubles. I will do so by quoting from your last comments...

Dear @Sprout , after reading many times your last comments tu clarify things, I have been through the second part of the PC's matrix. The sequence beginning by case 2, so XR. Here are the first three cases then 21, 22, and 23. I have some issues at ID correctly what you said. I must use...

last part

Dear Sprout Thank you very very much for your answers, your patience and your own work sharing. I truely appreciate that and you're a fundamental help to me. I hope what you're in now doesn't hurt you cerebrally too much. Take care of you haaha With that said, here comes my understandings from...

While waiting for some precisions, here is a simple preview of how i'd see things now, ignoring all but PC's and VC's form. I must admit I used my feeling to deduce on the OB bar that begins the short FF and this was the only moment on the chart I went beyond forms. Nothing crucial with that...

Here is the beginning of the drill. I have a kind of strange feeling while doing it, as I don't really get what I'm making different from the matrix I did and posted before, that follows here : Apart from the fact that I'm adding graphically the short and long BM's and drawing...

So here is the Finite Matrix of Volume Cases possible permutations depending on the length of volume bars that, in a given sequence, go with alternation from U to D and D to U. @Simples , your advice as for E cases is taking more and more sense now ;) I'm not gonna skip anything though, but...

And I seriously give you a big thank you for that, it is precious !!!

You're right, but I just wanted it to be perfectly so 100 %defined. I don't see any difference between something built and finite at 1% and another one at 99%. I only see their commun point -> their incompleteness. Now with that said, thank you for the advice cause it will make me gain some...

I missed something that was in my binder. I also went a bit deeper into the anlysis of volume cases. How ? As was previously said, from any given volume bar, we start and wait for the next one. When this second volume bar appears, three possibilities can surge : U, E or D. That's the 3's...

I forgive you <3

Let’s go back to the « defined/conflictuous/absent » trend established by some Price cases. In terms of form, what does - An XB say ? -> we have a LONG trend - An XR say ? -> we have a SHORT trend - A SYM say ? -> we have two trends in CONFLICT, a short and a long - An OB say ? -> we...

So we get clearly our 100 price cases combinations, we affected the 9 volume combinations that can surge. Let’s have a deeper look at what I just said concerning volume cases. To get clearer with volume cases, I had no other option to build the finite Volume cases Matrix. That’s how it goes...

And it ends here

3rd part is here

The next part is here

And here it is.

Let's talk about Volume, sticking up to FORMS. What can Volume do, like price, with two consecutive bars ? From any given volume bar that has its level and color (that is referred to the corresponding price bar's ubication of close compared to open), the next Volume bar can either : -> be...

So we'll begin with this Price Case Matrix. It is, by nature, only focused on the FORM that define two price bars in a row. And the shape, the form is defined by what did Bar 2 compared to Bar 1. Focusing on shape excludes then from the analysis (for the now) any sentiment and open/close...

Before beginning to post what is going to follow, let me say I hope you guys are experiencing nice iterative refinement, orders and great life moments. I wish you the best on that journey, and in your personal life. Lastly, I just psyched myself out, and seriously. It was a real burnout on...