Search results

'His' tables! There's always some non-trading f*cker with a 'table'. Gallacher is obviously the richest man on this earth with his tables. Whatever! Dackster.

Hahaha! Your only arguement relies on not knowing the future! Keep on buying you fool. Please, don't encompass everyone within your own train of thought. You will never be the best trader, and you will never be the richest man on earth. Deal with it. Dackster.

If you can't handle market direction, don't play options as a second guess! Dackster.

Chris, Fear will tell them otherwise. Dackster.

Look, you will not sell options because you need wealth, some players don't need wealth, and sell options. Your idea of risk is based upon what you can afford, others can afford you a thousand times over in one trade. Now do you understand? You really are living in a monkey bubble...

I'd like to hear more, please, explain. Dackster.

Psychology and money! That's my reasoning! Are you saying that psychology does not exist in trading? People with money sell options, and people without money buy options. Dackster.

Money! Enough money! Scared money will not take on the 'ideology' of selling options, it just doesn't run true to the 'needy'. It is the best 'option'. You are 'scared money', and you are doomed to failure whatever road you take. Dackster.

Black swans are for nerds without a brain. Surely you don't live your life in such a way? Do you accept what you understand, or do you always add for what is unreasonable? You can't trade like this. It's not healthy. Dackster.

Mark, are you fucking real!? You don't have to sell options all the time, only when it 'really' suits. Stop being a dick and get a life. Dackster.

Hahaha! Exactly. Look at GM motors! Car sales down, volume down, price has to go so low it rips the ass out! Volume leads price.:D Dackster.

Let's not forget this little nugget of wisdom. "Price can move without volume." Priceless (if you pardon the pun). Now, if a person has only one point of interest, one timeframe, then seemingly the price moves without volume, or on low volume. But, the analysis of volume does not...

Nope, the other way around. Mainstream 'PA' players will be drawing lines all over the chart and looking for 'confirmations' to go in,....That is SH!T! Real PA is about understanding sentiment and not lines. Understanding volume can get a player into the market without the price sentiment...

See, you're taking a snapshot, not understanding the snapshot, and then rubbishing what you don't understand. Dackster.

Exactly! Very few people know how to use volume correctly. Taking a snapshot of volume covering 1 min bars, and then trying to form a coherent and useful application of this is ridiculous, to say the least. Dackster.

:D Let the 'crowd' chew on this. Price is incidental to the following factors. 1. 'Who' wants to do business. 2. How much business 'they' want to do. 3. 'Who' is willing to take 'thier' business on. 'Sentiment' has an 'order' or 'flow', this creates the cycle and the price...

Good stuff Buzz! Here is my question regarding volume. How can contracts be distributed if they have not been accumulated? Volume leads price always! Dackster.

Three phases of 'buying volume' in the accumulative stage of a cycle. Why is the third phase smaller than the second phase, what's happening within the market? Surely the volume is not leading the price? Dackster.

Sellers have the edge. Also, black swans are a mathematical fairytale, that only exist in books. Dackster.