Search results

Haha, I'm not sure it's good for a persons sanity peering into the minds of madmen. I suppose it takes a sense of humour. Good trading. Dackster.

"Hey Joe" Reminds me of Joe Ross, threads, haha. "Trade what you see"...., so what do the likes of Neoxx actually see?Hahaha! Maybe Joe Ross, needs to contact Jack, because there is obviously some conflicting and confusing ideas knocking around. Dackster.

Importance or impotence. The bootcamp understanding of 'volume' (at least the way it's depicted at the crayola factory) is impotent, the SCT 'make believe' channels 'seem' to have more importance and potency than the limp wristed volume bars adhered to on the 'Pollock like' charts that are...

Ok, ok. I understand what you are saying, Joe, but when is SCT not SCT? ...when it's simplified, and so it ceases to be SCT, and so it's just your perception. The bootcamp wallers can't make SCT work, because they don't understand what is needed to be understood, and what they don't...

That's the paradox Joe, you have simplfied SCT, it's not supposed to be simplified, otherwise the bootcamp students have no perspective. At least with SCT the students can fail with a perspective (right or wrong), it gives them an psuedo incentive to refine.....don't take it away from them...

863 was a good sell, i looked for buyers basically dropping right out and sellers peaking at a cummulative contract level, so i'm looking for contracts to start being sold off at higher levels to buy in after peak buying volume, if i don't get this i keep on selling into the buying, so i'm...

Hey! Someone who knows how to trade, like your style. Nice posts, interesting. Dackster.

Ah! Seriously, it's all in the numbers, look at the chart, the market surely has no memory, or maybe the participants have number fetishes? Dackster.

Nice trading Mr. Doaks. I hope Jack puts a little into this thread. 1200, nice price for weeks now, the simple rule of 25 works well for the NQ. Dackster.

I always thought or used to think that SCT was about being in the market, always, at some size (which i agree with). Then the SCT clowns like neoxx and the like spoiled it all with thier absolute shit display of technique and crazy fucking charting. Jack, Go ahead with your own ideas...

The solution is to answer/address the voices correctly.

Socrates, The code for SCT, I hear JC Penny and Walmart have it on sale for $5 a throw. Dackster.

666, Jack truly is a first rate rotter and a cad. He's gone and dumped poor little Neon and co. Shameful. Dackster.

Socrates, I don't use channels as a 'whole', i may use the bottom line in a bull phase as a visual guage/'handrail', but to be honest....i don't really think they are relevant, but that's IMO. I would certainly never rely on the upper line of a channel within a bull phase or vice versa...

What Jack failed to explain to the chosen ones was that channel trading is about as probable as coin tossing on a purely technical basis. Note how the 'A' team channel bandwidth is sectioned off into segments, a channel could become a 'super channel'? Fanciful to say the least. Now, when...

Fabulous! I especially like the line "...so many questions remain..." Hahahaha! No suprise there then. Dackster.

Haha First i see ES as NQ, now i'm being offen'c'ive.....a timely exit for me....i think. Good trading all, Dackster.

Big C, my sincerest apologies (and i do mean that). In my alcohol fuelled frenzy of a reply to yours, for some reason i was thinking NQ..... I hope you don't take offence.

6-8? I've obviously missed some part of your joke, Big C. I'm willing to leave it at that (but only if you are.....big boy). Dackster.