Search results

Good morning, Joe. Yes, the characteristics of the system are reminiscent of the above mentioned. Thankyou. Dackster.

lol. Dackster.

Thankyou, Albert. Just thinking about 'SCT simplified' and the brilliance in simplifying 'it'. I'm sure you are familiar with a poster named, Socrates? Well, he posted a chart, 3 bars (daily bars, if i remember rightly), the central bar was the 'simplification', very nice indeed...

Anyway, enough of all this talk of gambling, coin tossing, game theory, unkowns and the like. Let me introduce you to OTPP (Ontario Teachers' Pension Plan), sponsored by the government of Ontario and the Ontario Teachers' Federation. Gamblers? Hahaha. Dackster.

Markets offer transparency, a game of poker does not nor does a roulette wheel or a slot machine. Gamblers don't need/use transparency, they just rely on odds and gaming theories. Dackster.

Understand what you are saying, and you are correct, but only up to a point. You mention 'dynamics', great, there are times to sell 'price x', because there are times when the market has made up it's mind and the dynamics are not going to change, at least for price x, because the dynamics that...

Some interesting posts here, but a lot of them are about coin tossing and statistics and not trading. I'll give an example. Price x has held previously to a certain amount of contracts traded, the market has now sold back into price x, and there are not enough buyers comming in for price x to...

I don't follow your logic, you can't 'pay off' the market, because the market will react to 'news', only some get the news before the rest of the market. Dackster.

Why is it illegal? Because the SEC says so? The SEC also says that trading isn't gambling. The 'Trading IS Gambling', lobby, seem to want it all thier own way. Dackster.

If trading was to be gambling, all outcomes uncertain, then there would no such thing as 'insider trading', as the 'insider' would never be any wiser to an outcome no matter how much information they had. Dackster.

Great stuff, Joe. I guess i was wrong about simplifying SCT, and so making it not SCT. Great charts by the way. Just had a peep at the 'A' team charts, always reminds me of a picture, it's an illusion, it's the one where your eyes follow the people walking up the steps only to find them at...

Please, Don't think you will be leaving this thread empty handed and bemused by some of the contributions, you have actually learned something about retail trading. Some people actually believe they are gambling when trading... It's not really that suprising is it...

Haha! Nice post! Now you've really got the baboons annoyed and angry....look how they're attacking the bars of thier cage....hahaha! Funny.

Do you think SCI stands outside the NYSE once a month with a banner that says 'Trading IS Gambling'? I think he does. Haha!

and....:confused:

Why do you prefer 99% mechanical, what's the other 1% for?

Thankyou, Joe. It's an absolute pleasure being part of the B team. Sincerely, Dackster.

You are very naive, SCI new york. You go ahead and cope with life in your own little way. Goodluck. Dackster.

Wots with all this talk of morons and gambling? I'm not a gambler, and the reason i'm not a gambler is because i don't view trading as one trade....like you do. Your view is moronic, in your view 'everything' is a gamble, which may be so up to a certain point, but you are reasoning at a...

No.