Search results

Actually, your questions have been answered very specifically and clearly. But you place the responsibility for your failure to understand elsewhere and resort to badgering, which is in itself a form of hostility. Since you are the only one who doesn't understand any of this, at least...

Depends on what the props are supposed to be for. :) He may have a degree in economics, but since when do economists have any idea how the market operates? LC

The perspective of a conspiracy theorist, perhaps. One might also suggest that he just doesn't grasp the seriousness of the situation. LC

Waiter! Reality check, please! [B] The manner in which you exhibit your "trading history" bears a remarkable resemblance to swiss cheese.:) LC

Given the manner in which surfer trades (I'm reluctant to call it a strategy) and given his performance (all these years and he still can't get it right), it's easy to understand why surfer not only cannot understand what ProfLogic is talking about but also that he is so envious of PL's results...

Human behavior is as predictable as the tides. And since behavior determines the movement of price, one cannot say that one is random and the other is not. LC

If one believes that the markets are random, it follows that he also believes that human behavior is random. LC

Paper trades are hardly "ultra high risk" :) LC

Of course, if he knew anything about trend, he wouldn't have shorted this stock in the first place, at least not yet :) LC

And that professional money is buying :) LC

Not unless the "trend followers" are incompetent. The trendline was broken two days ago. LC

Nor do most have the slightest idea how to find support and resistance :) LC

It's not so much a matter of belief or disbelief as it is whether or not one trades (i.e., something other than part-time on paper). Those who don't trade can believe or disbelieve whatever they like. Why not? Those who do trade, on the other hand, know. To say that trend does not...

OTOH, your first post was pretty much on the money, so . . . LC

I read the chart. Thank you. And thank you for providing your call. Now, perhaps, if there is no tap-dancing during the next "couple of weeks", the dispute between you and MS will finally draw to a close. LC

So what's the call for Monday? LC

However, none of this has anything to do with the suggestion, which is to show in real time how this approach works. The principles you espouse are sound, and anyone who pays attention ought to be able to incorporate them into their own trading to their advantage. But, again, this has nothing to...

Actually, why not? I should think that doing so would clear up a number of things. LC

At least you learned something about the risks inherent in trading with borrowed money. Or maybe you didn't. LC

However, this has much less to do with trendlines than it does with simple support and resistance. When price approaches the "trendline", look to the left. LC