Search results

For your brokerage account, stocks, futures, bonds, options, if you have a trade issue does your broker provide a paper trail logging the initial issue and provide updates via support tickets and/or emails.

Of course they are, we wouldn't want any brokers to lose any money.

This is the simplicity of it, the more perfect your setup and environment the more you make. 0. Keep a day job a) treat trading as a hobby to save then b) buy institutional services bypassing 1 2 & 3 1. Find a mentor who a) keeps 85% of net profits or b) marry in to HNW both bypassing 2 & 3...

Right, you're one of those, very nice. No point then in explaining your quote "you are ALWAYS winning (even when you are losing)" is the same as deluding yourself. Try telling Usain Bolt (gifted perfection) or Kobe Bryant (worked perfection) that they're failures. Only the irrational people...

Thanks Hillary, it's more profitable to be a rational trader going against the irrational money flow. The Dow collapse just made my weekend helping generate +22% of account this week.

If a left side trader, yes that's where all the profits are 'fighting the tape', although that term's a misnomer, it's the easier method once you get over there. If a right side trader, which covers most traders these days, they haven't got a chance and so in great irrational style, they...

Actually it is quite simple, most funds are incorporated in Caymen or BVI, if you accept US funds you need a master feeder setup. There are due diligence requirements for 'know your customer' and in certain cases minimum wealth requirements, most legal documents can be bought off the shelf...

Wrong, it is the slow sucker move, it's gives the illusion that people actually have a chance at making money in the markets, hence why they exist. The markets are about perfection, unless you have either bought in a methodology or been sent to hell and beyond risking real capital and still...

The only problem there is trading is about perfection, and if you don't have the time or are distracted then you are more likely to make mistakes. What do find interesting is it's possible to buy in a methodology with the second income to offset most of the risk, yet everyone still insists on...

The media and polls pick whoever pays the best, initially it was Clinton but their structure is now becoming a liability with Podesta, email servers, their foundation. The polls and media are now slowly starting to paint Trump in a more neutral light, whether good or bad is irrelevant, it's all...

That's the same as saying you're a winner coming second, what rubbish, right side traders for you - "you are ALWAYS winning (even when you are losing)" equals being lazy. Only constantly seeking perfection makes you a winner, either day by day or having a methodology so perfect you don't have...

Limited if any, only if you put your trades around large lots, and impacted if your data feed includes HFTs. The first will impact negatively and is pot luck, the second you may gain, be neutral, or lose, depends on strategy. There are bigger problems to worry about, it is rare anyone makes...

Rubbish, +14% of account today on two futures trades with @YM and @QM at 1mn timeframe with 5:1 P&L risk. Dreams only fail if you stop fighting by not knowing what you are doing.

If it's "I'm all ears" on the rational side then fine. 1. Don't reply because 95%+ of the forum posters sit on the right 2. Never said it was the institutions propping up the markets 3. Because you don't have a $multi-million analysis stream which shows the 3 pull lines 4. Retail traders use 2%...

Just watched "13 Hours", was taking a broadly balanced view, but only the pure evil of a psychopath can make comments “Did we survive the day?” and 'What difference, at this point, does it make?'. Anyone supporting that line is either in the same general category or an unfortunate lemming.

Doesn't matter if it's an election or forex or stocks, the underlying process is the same. Institutions know the money flow and can pick off more or less any point they want. Relatively simple with an institutional indicator, which I have, picking off pulls from irrational. All discretionary...

It just money flow, it's nothing complicated. Aristocracy - Elite - Wealthy - Mass Populace - Bipolar - Schizophrenic - Psychopath It goes from middle to right to left to middle. Only the right are trying to block any backflow to origin and any flow to the left, thereby producing the illusion...

Is there a particular reason you are contradicting yourself apart from not being very experienced: knowledge means using a technique, observation or approach; a cash advantage is money flow from one player to yourself.

An edge is simply knowledge of the direction of money flow and then positioning yourself to take maximum advantage of it.

In fairness when it's illusionary as with almost all politicians these days, they all pathologically lie, it then only depends on how much. True elite are for small government - long-term infrastructure - foundation for those less fortunate focusing on equality - flat taxes so everyone has...