Search results

-Similar characteristics is possibly a misnomer. Certain events happen across stocks that are dissimilar. Eg AMD and CAT exhibit similar characteristics, but not CAT and DE. Their correlations and fundamentals may be similar but technically, no. Imagine mirrors; some convex, some concave. The...

Getting like 4 people on C2 asking me to keep going with it because I made them a decent amount quick... I wonder, maybe I could use C2 with Auto-Trader in conjunction with the account I'm trading right now. But with a bigger scale obv

Just a few. I know that there are certain methods to determine a lot movements but this will require the use of an algo, which I have not used.

This is what I've been doing for a long time. Let me add to it: Many of the past so called 'greats' have said, in different ways, that different stocks have different personalities. That is, certain patterns work better for different vehicles. Therefore, pattern success is expected to occur...

So if I win a trade, n=1, and I'm 100%? Woo! But yeah I've posted the prediction thread before, roughly 90% accuracy for half a year and over 50 trades Shorted the AMD high today but closed for measly profit before the big drop. EoD things... I'd posit that failure types are also significant...

How many samples are required to determine statistical significance?

Do ancient techniques not display consistent behavior across thousands of years? The compelling force behind traders buying silk and selling it at a point of exchange is commonly recurrent in spite of short term flux. I can predict intraday movement years in advance, as can other users of...

current chart

668.43 tsla should reverse. lets see if it works today

Not everyone can call the trades live, which I did as evidenced by lack of edits and multiple other users agreeing. Highs/Lows of day were caught a statistically significant number of times. Wallstreet guys go bust often, they're not invincible. TA is a broad science, not the retail triangle HS...

You've proven why TA doesn't work- because people do not know how to read. https://www.elitetrader.com/et/threads/prediction-based-trading.351176/page-42 Again, I link this precise page because it was the last time I posted on the spreadsheet BEFORE switching to C2. That's 6 months of live...

Problem with people who disregard TA simply don't know what to look for. It's proven to work.

yes: https://www.elitetrader.com/et/threads/prediction-based-trading.351176/page-42

Fun while it lasted, but I'm trading with big now (7s), don't wana get distracted with anything else. Perhaps this will be the end of the thread

Up more today yay https://collective2.com/details/134463089 chart should update soon. So far, slippage has not been a major concern

I tried logging in on 2 desktop computers and it said it isn't allowed to login on two at the same time. It works for 1 desktop and 1 mobile though.

I considered that too. I remember those too ones still floating up there. Another thing was that they failed to scale and just sunk back down; returns can slow as in the Avi Butz strategy. There may be more info in the forum section of C2 of historical top performers. Also, C2 penalizes new...

So for example at the bottom right, we can see this strategy has an average leverage of 10. This means that if he takes a trade equal to the average, it will make or lose around 10% for each percent its holding does. You said its impossible. It isn't. How is this possible? Margin. And this is...

C2 displays 'average leverage ratio' and mine is 1.5. The ones I was referring to are POLR Bull and Excelsior. They run a a heck lot more. I was referring to the top ranked traders on C2. One can see how long they've had their strategy open to the public. To clarify, why have those long term...

I looked at different 'best' strategies on C2 that don't show up (mainly due to recency) in the Grid function to compare them to my own. One of them has 100% winrate (been around for only a couple of months) That strategy averages down and has a strategy reset. I don't know why because although...