Search results

What good are we traders for? Not very "DAMN STRAIGHT!" I'll give it "DAMN STRAIGHT!": Most of them "traders" help pay for the profits of the nimble fellas.

The waiting line for my services is over 3 years right now. Many people seem to obviously want what you describe here above. Don't expect to learn for a few $1,000 something that will earn you millions. It simply doesn't make sense.

You should backtest WITH THESE ADDITIONAL LOSS RULES IN PLACE. You may be surprised at what you will find.

That's what I've been saying a long time. For most of today's garden variety (including trading) applications, you'll find that: 1 + 1 = 1 + possibly a very meager little chunck. I only look at benchmark figures. The above holds for most of what I am running here. In this sense, a lot has...

God did not intervene to save His Son, Jesus from dying on the cross. You may reflect on this. In fact, atheists and like kinds, professionals or not, when talking God, only sound like hollow kettles.

pull yourself out of the sh*t: GO LINUX

Keep on explaining TV to your granny, stu.

The only good answer to all this is benchmarking. I have not done this for the dualcore chips, but from intensive testing of dual processors under non-server loads, it's quite frustrating to see that total processor load almost never exceeds 50%. In my experience, the OS and driver processes...

rule #1: never lose; rule #2: never forget rule #1.

setup for a bottom sure. but when, in a couple of months, in a year, in 3 years? :confused: PS: don't care about this, as long as the markets wobble enough. :)

trading without charts...suicide? for most, trading is always ... suicide, with or without charts. We like this though, cause somebody has to chip in for the wins of the nimble ones. :)

you searched for the WRONG guy. :D :D :D

Yeah! " In case you're one of the corporate blue hairs that's behind the times, Java is no longer the "cool" developer language for Web sites. " Read all: http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/jun2006/tc20060613_924682.htm

Any of you guys dreaming about losses?

Indeed spike, The market gives different things to different people. Corrolary: It only gives losses to most. (They pay for the presents to the above ones)

Few Mathematics PhD's actually train on "solv[ing] numerical problems programmatically". If this is your purpose rosy, you must mostly be hiring the wrong guys. You yourself obviously never "solve[d] numerical problems programmatically." Further, look back at some recent ET threads on...

Funny toe fella: Can't YOU read the thread title: "Can YOU be profitable with random entry?" If the thread launcher meant it as a theoretical exercise, let's all admit that he's also funny. Why waste your time on a funny-farm gimmick. OK for VT's loser books and ET-oddballs, not for...

Of course not, it's a monkey-system.

Of course, Jesse didn't have an ET forum to fall back on.

Some kind of a monkey once got started on this. Whether this still qualifies as "random", I'm not sure. :D