Search results

Oh oh, I see FP has been drinking again... ha ha... Here is a pic of FasterPussyCat after drinking too much http://www.pukepics.com/iimages/pukers/1.jpg Kidding!!! peace axeman

Lots of problems with your post.

That is exactly why I asked for a VERY PRECISE definition of god to start this debate with. For some people, god is a synonym for the universe. In this case, god does exist. For others, its the christian god, and in that case, I would say there is no rational reason to believe in such...

Just want to point out that attempting to argue a "could exist" is meaningless without your opponent starting with a VERY PRECISE definition of god. Example: Could 5 headed, glowing, unicorns exist on mars? Answer: of course Example: Is it possible that at one time a giant Elvis...

Ouch!!! Fortunately, I came to the conclusion that fundaments were total bullshit right at the start. Are you trading full time now? If so.... you get the Trading TENACITY award! :D peace axeman

I wish I had never heard of TA and simply started watching the markets. I would have learned faster and saved a lot of money. peace axeman

"Daniel_m, a trader of one" :D peace axeman

Im not buying it. If trading is 80% mental, and "easy" as many claim it is, then it should be pretty easy to write a fully automated trading system. Keep it simple...take all yours trades...blah blah... These are all things computers are real damn good at, and yet, finding a...

Circular reasoning. Your claim of gods intelligence is WORTHLESS until you FIRST prove his existence. But I already know you wont understand what I just said. So whats the point. peace axemn

Picture of Faster, passed out and drunk off his ass http://members.tripod.com/nomennescio/pics/images/aaron_06april02_2.jpg :D Kidding!!! :D peace axeman

I cant tell if Faster is OFF his meds or ON his meds :D peace axeman

Coming from someone who has failed miserably in trying to defend his position, that is pretty funny. Hacks? What a hypocrite. We are still waiting for one teeny weeny shred of a defense out of you. You have delivered nothing but excuses. That is clear. If anyone deserves the title...

I think your misreading Dan. I think he is just basically saying that the only proof that matters is proof that is available to everyone, not to only one person internally. peace axeman

Bravo. EXACTLY Dan! Dark isnt even attempting to be like Einstein and present his theory, then defend it until it is accepted. Instead, we get excuses about how you cant do this on a message board. If email and message boards were around, I bet Einstein WOULD have published...

Nitro, You are replying to me, BUT I DIDNT WRITE THAT!! lol :D peace axeman

Dark, You didnt even TRY! "my point was that 'the beef' cannot be put on a message board in a way that will satisfy you, which i tried to illustrate in straightforward terms. " And with that final EXCUSE, I think Mr Dark has officially conceded this debate. peace axeman

"You know that I can defend my position, and you know I have done so elsewhere on this board. " No we dont know. Ive never seen it. "For you to continually demand 'evidence' from me is little more than taunting, for reasons I have cited and given credence to." He wouldnt do this if...

He did not write it off as bunk. He simply pointed out the fact that you ONCE AGAIN failed to provide any evidence for your position. Instead, you ran off on a tangent and dodged the entire discussion. You commited several fallacies in your previous post, which I was about to...

Agreed. But as I stated before... we are not concerned with personal evidence when someone is making assertions to other people. peace axeman

No need to argue semantics. However, I think we can all agree, as daniel is stating, that the only evidence we are interested in is evidence that can be SHOWN to support your position. Dark has produced no such evidence. If all you have is evidence that only you can experience...