Search results

Pro Firms must be feeling the pinch. Traders are quitting. ANd volumes getting light. Any Pro Firms to avoid?

http://biz.yahoo.com/rc/021006/tech_intel_spain_1.html INTC's Barrett says early 2003 recovery AND he states negative view on VC activity Looks like the negative cancels out the positive in my opinion

do we really need a racist trader posting?

Your pre-mkt post was wrong.

Many idiots post here. Many comments/threads are useless. Derogatory comments are senseless. Actual trading secrets won't be revealed for free. However, there are some truths... Hope you are not blaming your trading mishaps on information you receive here. More importantly, never allow...

SELL

awwww

What time zone is used in ET threads?

This foretells further NASDAQ selling along with the possibility of S&P decline.

trade what you see NOT what you assume

otherwise, I woul've been there

if you are a slow learner or extreme novice, then Bright has something to offer to you...(for the first 6 months maybe) Otherwise, you will notice that most of the highly profitable traders in Bright's offices have brought in their own computers and subscribe to their own charting/analysis...

good call... Went short AXP and C

just that the overnight mark up was substantiated by lackluster news. support and resistance showing equal strength. not bullish nor bearish at the open to do any opening orders.

I couldn't short or long this morning's gap.

the moves are dictated by light volume... why? lack of liquidity in both directions bullshit pushing bullshit while the funds continue to unload shares. you have to be lucky and good today

Then we could sue IRAQ instead...

Anything not working or working in trading? Post your triumphs or curses...

is required if the firm acts in nasdaq bd capacity. another dept could trigger that requirement.

Why is the NASDAQ making the 55 more difficult? I spoke to another person that got a 77. He thought he scored in the upper 80's. Are there too many traders?