Search results

  1. F

    POLL : Fibonacci ,Gann,Elliot Wave...

    Some people use a combination of Fibo's and Elliott wave ?
  2. F

    How to define a trend 100 % objectively ?

    I just read he doesn't have the balls to call trades and he comes here in my thread to criticize me , the internet is full of those characters
  3. F

    How to define a trend 100 % objectively ?

    you mean, +2 for me ?! Spiderman admitted by saying that I should use the LR that his "definition" of a trend is not objective LOL (the "experienced" teacher or better poster with 6300 posts) Back on topic , looking for a hard definition that can match the LR
  4. F

    Strategy runner disconnects

    Strategy Runner itself or with some brokers ? a live or demo account ?
  5. F

    I love the greenback...2008

    Why not trade a real account ?!
  6. F

    Trade from the charts with Transact/sierracharts ?

    Is that possible ?
  7. F

    ib must be selling order flow on options

    When will there be a pure ECN structure to trade options making it a level playing field ? It doesn't exist yet ?
  8. F

    Why do I see "Trends" in Randomly Generated Data?

    Is Marketsurfer Larry Williams ?
  9. F

    What futures platforms/brokers offer tick by tick,unfiltered data feed ?

    I know TT does , so does Ninja/Zenfire What about J-trader ? Transactfutures ? Openecry ?
  10. F

    Strategy runner disconnects

    You are on a demo feed.. What broker ?
  11. F

    POLL : What options you trade ?

    Thanks, Sir ! :)
  12. F

    ib must be selling order flow on options

    IB's profits come first , then that of their customers (IB is not a charity organisation:) )
  13. F

    How to define a trend 100 % objectively ?

    EXACTLY ! That is the crucial thing when you start talking about local highs and lows, when does a certain zone becomes a local high or low, you need first to define this BEFORE you can use these local highs and lows to derive the trend from it.
  14. F

    How to define a trend 100 % objectively ?

    From which moment you can say there is a higher high and higher low , THAT is the subjectivity in the description Till now only linear regression as definition fits the bill.
  15. F

    How to define a trend 100 % objectively ?

    6300 posts , is he the resident teacher at ET ? LOL
  16. F

    How to define a trend 100 % objectively ?

    Glad to see you can think for yourself, more good "stuff" is always welcome The problem is WHEN you have a local higher "high" and local higher "low" in the uptrend ..
  17. F

    How to define a trend 100 % objectively ?

    Sorry, I was thinking in probability terms :)
  18. F

    How to define a trend 100 % objectively ?

    I already have linear regression as a worthy definition for a trend, besides your misplaced criticism,anything interesting to add, mister Spiderman ?
  19. F

    How to define a trend 100 % objectively ?

    That is indeed a "hard" definition for what a trend could be
  20. F

    How to define a trend 100 % objectively ?

    The mode of the thread is asking for specific "hard code"rules , not pen and paper approach because that is subjective You are using the word "trend" but you don't have a hard definition...
Back
Top