Search results

I'm gonna go out on a limb and say we only had 4 traverses today and 1 channel. I have my chart up. I have one big traverse, the blue one where some may have a channel. I annotated how I've been annotating it following all the rules from my recollection learning from posts and comparing charts...

Isn't that what Monitoring and comparing is supposed to teach you?

Its still fits the definition for a lateral movement and it comes before the pennant. I don't understand why we would just disregard this especially since we're thinking of it as a non-dominant retrace. By the way how many traverses/channels are there today?

Please not although it doesn't look it the Jokari change is on bar close of 10:20 just as romanus has it.

I saw it even slightly differently(leaving in the parts that confuse me

I understand and agree with you on the first traverse. The second dominant traverse is what gets me. If we could do the ehorn drill with that one showing tapes Id appreciate it ....Id say the 10:40 to 10:50 end of bar are our dominant down tape. The 10:55 and 11:00 bars are our...

I didnt say the pt 3 came at 11:05. I'm saying it didn't come at all from what I see. The 11:15 bar, 11:20 bar, and 11:25 bar are all stuck in that lateral. The annotation for pt 3 comes at 11:15 end of bar. What I'm saying is it doesn't come here either. I said the LATERAL STARTED at 11:05 end...

What was the FTT on the first traverse then? I thought it was pennant BO but it would have to be pennant FBO to be an FTT on the traverse level(from what I understood from past posts). The first traverse had to have a reason for ending . I totally can see the pts 1 2 and 3 confirmed and the...

So the wrong thing to do here would be to fan the original pt 3 of the first traverse. The correct thing to do would be if you had viewed the lateral(beginning at 10:15 close of bar) as a non-dominant retrace of a channel and a lateral traverse.. Ive been waiting to ask this one. If what i...

The pace of the 12:10 bar to the 12:20 bar is 12,858 gain in volume from bar 12:10 to bar 12:15 and then 13,480 gain in volume from bar 12:15 to bar 12:20. Mathematically, this validates that the 12:20 bar did increase acceleration. But I still cant figure out why the 14:40 is not.

Spyder would I be correct in saying this means that peak volume is evident on the final of the three circled volume bars in my chart because the slope of the fluorescent green bar accelerates over the slope of the fluorescent blue bar. I can see how this is the case in confirming that the 14:00...

On my attached chart for today. the pink circled bars look like great examples of tape level changes, thus not annotated as FTTs on the traverse level. They both seem to follow the decreased volatility on increased volume signal for change. The question(s) I have here is because of the first...

Romanus you think you could find any examples from past charts of the last three situations(i.e. increasing volume appears to confirm pt 3 but comes from 1. RTL Break 2. Formation BO/FBO 3. Spike Bar Much obliged.

I have 9 traverses and 1 channel. I feel like there could be another channel or two short there but they the one I'm thinking of wouldn't widen the traverses that contain it

How many traverses and/or channels were there in today's chart.

Does anyone have a fully annotated ES chart for today that i can compare with? Would be much appreciated.

Actually you dont have to draw the Guassians if you know at the time how you're gonna draw them end of day. As the chart moves I make a mental note of how I'm seeing the Guassians with my traverses and they're drawn in end of day.... nothing changes from the time they developed. They'll look the...

How I have the day so far without Guassians I do them at the end as I cant annotate both at the same time yet because I get sidetracked.

You have the black bold traverse.... I didn't originally. Thats your fifth traverse. I had 4 for the day.