Search results

government is doing too much too fast and people are necessarily getting scared from that, they've done enough, the opportunity cost of propping up the markets is getting higher and higher and each time we are getting a lower and lower marginal benefit from it. eg. The 150billion dollar...

this is the kind of rumor spreading that goes on on yahoo message boards, if you want to post please post something intelligent that can have some kind of discussion done on not fear mongering, mod please delete this thread.

if someones portfolio is down 50% and you are 55 or less even maybe 60 years old or less they will not sell, the people who sold are 65-75+ who need the money to live now although they will probably have to go to work again lol

if cocacola and intc earnings didn't jack positiive shit for the markets than who gives a flying fuck about google, they arn't a bellweather for ANYTHING except their own little niche market which no one cares about.

US should attack china and nuke another country

stock should go to zero no one believes they can make money in them anymore.

dow needs to go down another 7000 points for this to be concidered capitutlation

educated guess is where we started the very steep decline back in september so somewhere around 1100-1150 on the sp500

Lol if you turn on BBC apparently Gordon Brown is the man that organized it, no bias there!

sarkozy is da man

hmm interesting, you will know the answer to your question by adding a 12, 26, 46, 76 and 101 moving average to your charts in addition to your other indicators because the ones you have are not enough, then you will see a pattern.

agreed energy got hit so fucking hard it's not funny. Energy names in general will bounc back hardest that includes oil related stock, oil producers, maybe refiners, utilities maybe, solar, wind , ...

disprove of what accusation i simply don't agree with the statement he made simply because it is pure opinion, if he provided me with an example or facts then i'd believe, I have a trading account with real money and it is small by ET standards < $10k, i don't trade full time, i go to school, i...

this is why ET is stupid people say shit without providing any factual information to back up their stupid opinion. what i said was it is the same in liquid equities like skf and xlf SURE you will pay a lot more in commissions but honestly prove me wrong please.

i hear this so much that trading this amount is not the same as trading this amount, if it is a very liquid stock i'd like that hypothesis proven wrong as i think it is bullshit. In liquid equities and if the $2400 means as much to one person as 24million does, i think it is just as hard to make...

if you look at someone on this board called neke he's had a few 5% days lately... totally possible. not on 24mil but on a very respectable ~250k. like someone else said if you can't make money trading NOW when volatility is giving you so many opportunities, then you shouldn't be trading at all.

that was with vix at 40, vix is at 70 so we could technically see 17% x let's say 50% more volatility than in 2001 = 25.5% LOL i dunno if that would happen

ye greenspan took it down to .87, bernanke i heard on cnbc has taken the rate down to as low as .5 recently, i have a feeling we are going to have another bubble like scenario in 5-6 years except it will be even worse because bernanke has taken the rate down so low and the banks have been...

if you put ALL the supply of everything on ONE day the price would literally be zero and the stock market would follow.

thnx i was thinking of switching to them gotta try out their platform i guess. here in canada we have very little choices...