Search results

  1. L

    Fractal Theory I

    As I stated before, your presumption is incorrect. Jack and Spyder understood and explained fractal integrity quite thoroughly through the years, both in the forums at certain points when their audiences understood enough of the fundamentals to be able to have a discussion about the...
  2. L

    Fractal Theory I

    This discussion brings up a good opportunity to expand upon something out for anyone following along and trying to advance their understanding of this method. Thinking that those two containers are equal is a symptom of one of the largest problems I've found with individuals trying to learn...
  3. L

    Fractal Theory I

    Definitely; they aren't equal to each other. The blue box contains a full gaussian sequence in and of itself; and the purple does not. This alone disqualifies them from equality.
  4. L

    Fractal Theory I

    midtown, you do not have three equal containers on that chart. It's likely that xioxxio has an imperfect understanding of either laterals or extended sequences if he is seeing three equal containers there. It's great if his method and understanding works for him; more power to anyone who...
  5. L

    Fractal Theory I

    At some point you need data of a higher granularity in order to more accurately telegraph the faster fractals exact FTT's with greater accuracy. In the past many tools such as 2m YM, STR-SQU, tick charts, etc. were used for this purpose. You won't always be able to pinpoint a BBT's FTT with...
  6. L

    Fractal Theory I

    Good question midtown. I believe in one of my images at the beginning of the thread, I stated that the FTT's of the smaller fractals form the points of the larger fractals. As we need to draw the line somewhere, and there is a limit to how much is visible to us on the 5m interval, we just use...
  7. L

    Fractal Theory I

    The simple answer was that the container is a BBT; it didn't get promoted. However, during it's construction, faster fractals became visible due to the way it formed with a lateral for it's non-dominant leg and a VE which expanded the container without ending or promoting it. Complexity in...
  8. L

    Fractal Theory I

    This is a really good question; let me try to clarify something about my comment that it was promoted to a higher fractal. A lot of this method hinges on an individual's ability to study, test, and define circumstances in a consistent manner for themselves. A lot of breakdown in the learning...
  9. L

    Fractal Theory I

    Nice find baro; the medium thickness gaussian sequence is exactly what I would've put down for a fully completed trend sequence if I was annotating that chart in RT. I annotate one more level down though, so their L2 is my L3 and they don't annotate my L1.
  10. L

    Fractal Theory I

    plantrader, This isn't about the charts. If you honestly felt uncomfortable because of the possibility that you would be violating a previous agreement, you could've just shared that with me initially instead of ignoring, deflecting, and then refusing my request by citing an unrelated motive...
  11. L

    Fractal Theory I

    Vertex, Great question. These are valuable areas to be looking at. Beginning with FC's, we can hopefully begin to see the minimum of two dominant legs which compose them and how they relate to each other. As the market as fractal, these same exact principles apply to how the dominant legs of...
  12. L

    Fractal Theory I

    I stated before, IF you wanted to continue our dialogue, to post a chart you received so I could understand what you were learning from. I'm also personally curious how developed the coursework that you've stumbled upon for this method is. You've decided not to comply for the reason that you'd...
  13. L

    Fractal Theory I

    I'm not upset; although the sense of entitlement I perceived in xioxxio's post where he hasn't contributed anything valuable to the thread yet he evidently feels comfortable dictating me to post more content and challenging my transparency when I didn't respond instantly to your demand for a...
  14. L

    Fractal Theory I

    I've already "put myself out there" and posted plenty of annotations in my thread already. I'm donating some time and effort to explaining the principles behind my trading at no personal benefit to myself; I am not obligated to do anything nor are you entitled to anything. Here's my chart for...
  15. L

    Fractal Theory I

    Were you given any charts you know to be correctly annotated during your mentoring? It might be helpful to see what the finished product of the skill-sets you were learning is to see whether it is the same conventions that I use. We can eventually get to comparing and viewing whole multi-day...
  16. L

    Fractal Theory I

    Yes and no. Yes and no. Yes and no. --- I feel like had this conversation already. It sounds like you're asking questions about general procedures to handle all VE's everywhere. The answers are almost always going to be context dependent. You rapid-firing a dozen questions per post and...
  17. L

    Fractal Theory I

    You aren't asking the right questions imo. I'll humor you though. Here is how I would handle the teal thing you're referring to, but seeing me draw a few TL's isn't going to help you at all when you don't understand what is happening inside of said container. You haven't even drawn...
  18. L

    Fractal Theory I

    Regarding your question about VE's; I think you're losing track of your fractals when considering them. I sharpen trend-lines with ITZ for the fractal which was ITZ'd. With NITZ, the fractal which was NITZ'd is expanded but if there is a visible sub-fractal which formed the NITZ, you need to...
  19. L

    Fractal Theory I

    Simply put; because I don't feel like it. I reject your premise that the burden of proof lies upon myself. I have no vested interest whatsoever in convincing anyone of this theory's validity. Additionally, come to think of it, I view it as a peripheral benefit that the interest of those who...
  20. L

    Fractal Theory I

    Yes, you have the right idea. The reality is that price and volume fluctuations are continuous in nature. We can view them through segmented intervals of whatever length we choose, but the splicing of the data has absolutely no significance to the operation of the market itself. This is why...
Back
Top