Search results

Here is an image I made that can be used by participants to print or open in paint for learning about price bars.

Just curious; what information are you looking to find on a recent chart vs. all the ones he has already posted so far? Perhaps I could help.

I agree with you there that this seems to be the case. I believe it will be very enlightening for us to look into the 30m and 5m interlock once we get there; it should clear up some of these issues.

The A - D capital letters are the Trend Types, matching the four panels of the Modrian Table. If you notice, they reset to type A when there is a 'c turn' because a new trend has begun. Jack only suggests 'c turn' to 'c turn' trading for beginners, but he usually takes at least 60% of all...

No, I just created it from my mind since the situation happens very frequently when logging and using the Modrian Table. Here is a back-to back example of it from one of Jack's charts. For the first Dominant up-trend I drew in Black for Dominant up legs, and Red for Non-Dominant down legs...

Using the Modrian Table, it is curious that Non-Dom legs of a trend sometimes travel more price units than Dom legs, which never happens with Jack's channel and gaussian annotation system. This can happen multiple times in a single trend, or multiple times in the day. Jack could have chosen...

I have Bar 59 BO T1 also, double EE on non-OB checks last EE for Fail-safe, if yes assign P1 on current bar.

What exactly is your exit criteria? It consistently seems like you create more trades than there are valid signals for a given time period, even on the fastest fractal I can see using the 1m. This was why I thought an adjacent time-frame might be helpful in order to keep over-activity in...

That's a tricky one. I never got to the bottom of exactly the correct Stitch squish procedure. We do know that XB, Stitch [wait], Sym doesn't form a lateral 3, which might point to a Stitch expanding the bounds that we check the next measurable bar for translation against, even if it isn't...

Another way to have PP5b: If you have a bar with more than one end effect [more than one EE on top of OB for example], you look to the last bar and if it is not a failsafe, we have P1 assignment on next measurable bar [bottom of OB for example]. So P2/P1 if we have BM REV + PP1b or something...

I had Ag for Bar 79, does Bar 78 rule have something to do with why you didn't annotate that?

Does anyone know what actions the circles, arrows, and diamonds on Jack's charts represent? The Red/Black boxes we know are Reversals, but I haven't found anywhere what the others are.

Are you asking an honest question with a desire to learn and improve, or trying to vent/find sympathy? I suppose your response will soon shed light on the issue. I'll give you the benefit of the doubt, though. If making money long or short seems impossible, you have to realize that you...

Okay, so if T2F occurs, the next bar is tested for trend continuation. In order for this to occur, the volume on the next measurable bar needs to be bounded by T1 and T2F. This bar is labeled P3F. So, we have P3F. A possible case of T2P to T2F to T2P exists, as quoted above. How do we get a...

I understand that A Band can trigger after B Band, because there is no n+1 test for B Band. What is difficult for me to understand is how we can ever get the T2P T2F triplets required for the last bands, if any T2P repeat is going to cause Ba. I initially assumed the n+1 test for a band...

I just looked up haywire: erratic; out of control. I agree with you; it was an incorrect word choice. I should have said they induce abnormal volatility.

FOMC statement release usually makes things go haywire.

Do we have the same understanding of n+1 then? The first n+1 test is for an EE of the C or F bands, after the first T2F occurs (C Band is established). Later when Bands H and K arrive with T2P/T2F triplets, they have their own n+1 test for either H or K band EE's. If the test is false for...

Don't want to clutter up the thread, but wanted to point out 10:30 to 10:45. This is the first completed sub-fractal trend of the day that I've recorded. The RDBMS uses two fail-safes, which take care of late reversals based off sentiment changes which happen on a fractal smaller than the one...

Window for editing posts is passed, I'll stop here. I think this has been a good demonstration of my current skill set. Not yet adept enough at carving intra-bar turns to profit while staying on the right side of the market. All of the runs are captured, which more than make up for the washes...