Search results

Bot 25 SPY $144 Jan 2007 Puts (SFBMN) $5.68

Closed out at 4.41 Trade P/L= +$1,020 Cumulative P/L= +$7,650

Sold out at $2.50. Trade P/L= +$1,250 Cumulative P/L= +$6,630

Good Bad Bad Bad

Does this mean you will let turd3r sleep on your couch?

This guy needs to get off the pipe! what a call dude.

If we dropped 5 thousand points, you would say it was bullish. You are a one hit wonder dude. pathetic!

Obviously a large piece of bad news is emminent and being priced in. Watch. Bet a big bank is about to go under.

Now that the UK Treasury favors Virgin as the bidder for Northern Rock against Buffett, maybe Buffett will look at E*Trade?!?!?

As a true Enron demise, Goldman Sachs. Nobody could have imagined the Enron demise, just like Goldman going down?? Get Real!!

Here it is Sunday 11/25 at 11:53 am CST. I fired up ICE to see that Dec natty is trading 7.934 last, up quite a bit from last week. Looks like the colder forecast is going to get a squeeze going into settlement this Wednesday.

Picked up a book on global history this weekend for a gift. The title of the book is History the Definitive Visual Guide, From the Dawn of Civilization To the Present Day. While thumbing through it I happened on the page about the Great Depression. We all know about the subject so I won't...

I agree with you 100%. The problem is too many are looking at what caused the last recession (high P/E's) and comparing the current P/E's and saying that there is no over-valuation and stocks are cheap. It will be different this time allright, different in the way we go into a bear market...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o-rHEvXfIP4 live in Houston next Friday night!

Bot 20 SPY $143 Dec 2007 Calls (SFBLM) $3.90

Buying nearly 5 months of time for $1.10 on a stock that is about as cheap as it will get unless it goes under. More of a fundamental and risk/reward play than anything. They look like a buyout candidate on the cheap for a capitilaized firm to acquire all the accounts and existing banking...

Bot 25 ETrade (ETFC) $3 April 2008 Calls (EUSDG) $2.00 90 cents intrinsic value with 5 months of time, very good risk/reward.

I didn't read that the gov is going to pay the terms, what I understand is that the lender realizes they stand to lose more foreclosing on the property than they would keeping the rate low for a longer term. Let the idiot who can't afford the house pay the note longer.

Why exactly? Seems a win/win at face value anyway. The homeowner keeps his home and avoids a hike that forces him out, and the holder of the debt doesn't lose money foreclosing on the house. If they raise the rate on the ARM, buyer is out and lender loses at least 20% since market value is at...

You sound alot like this fool-