I will trade an up bias when my indicators read up. This could happen at 1050 or 950, or any other number. I have no way of knowing at what level it would turn.
9/2/03 Day 11
ES
Bias: down
Position: open from 1018 on 9/2/03
P/L: -22.5 (990-1008, 1018)
Sell and hold P/L: -32.5 (990-1022.5)
ZF DEC03
Bias: up
Position: open from 109'040 on 9/2/03
P/L: -10/32 (109'260-109'060, 109'040-109'160, 109'040)
Buy and hold P/L: -24/32...
ES range 1004.5-1022.5, sell @ 1018
ZT range 108'270-109'205, stop @ 109'060, buy @ 109'040, sell @ 109'160, buy @ 109'040
YG range 372.5-382.5, no trade (entry not hit)
QM range 29.3-31.5, no trade (missed 2 point drop, entry not hit)
It's not like I am starting to trade these contracts now. I have been actively trading all of them and this is a step toward a more systematic approach.
How to find whether a hypothesis is correct?
Through experiments.
Is there cost to running any experiments?
Yes.
What if I don't...
8/29/03 Day 10 (revised)
ES
Bias: down
Position: none
P/L: -18 points (990-1008)
Sell and hold P/L: -18 points (990-1008)
ZF DEC03
Bias: up
Position: open from 109'260 on 8/29/03
P/L: 1/32
Buy and hold P/L: 1/32
YG DEC03
Bias: up
Position: none
P/L: 0
Buy and hold P/L: 0...
The experiment will continue in the big account, and its scope has expanded to include 1 ZF, 1 YG and 1 QM.
Same idea with the following parameters:
ES stop 18 target 9
ZF stop 20/32 target 10/32
YG stop 6 target 3
QM stop 1 target 0.5
10 point range (999-1009) for the day. Stopped @ 1008. ES jumped up and down in the last minutes (1005-1009) but closed at exactly 1008 as if planned. Everyone knows next week is when the real thing begins and I will start with no position.
I am saying it because: 1) I don't want people to ask me for advice; and 2) I don't want to respond to "why you didn't do this or that".
How I refer to myself has no effect on how I am doing things. You may be putting too much weight in it.
I am new only when compared to you. I will always...