Search results

You're acting irrationally (although I don't know if you ever acted rationally). I picked the polls closest to the election date that I could find. Given the dynamic nature of the primary, there were large variations of the polls over time. It's ridiculous to average them. I can wager a bet...

Obama under performed mostly in states that are not in contention, like CA, NY, and TX. I picked the states that are in contention now. Even if there is a Bradley effect in TX, it won't affect the outcome of the election. I'm not under any obligation to "compute" if there is a Bradley effect...

Even though it seems cruel to take away the last straw you're clinging onto, here are some actual numbers: Virginia: Poll (Insider Advantage 2/8): Obama 52% Clinton 37% Actual vote: Obama 64% Clinton 36% Poll error: Clinton +13 West Virginia: Poll (Suffolk University 5/11): Clinton 60%...

LMAO. They can't even get it right on the freaking afternoon of the election and they have the ball calling themselves the "most accurate." And what's the point of your linking their press release?

Are all Republicans on drugs these days? Zogby "the most accurate in the last election?" What alternative universe are you in? Zogby predicted a Kerry victory for crying out loud! http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1282/is_22_56/ai_n13659409 Late afternoon on Election Day--awfully late...

"All of 'em"? It sounds pretty unequivocal. But no, you're now trying to wiggle out of it. Ah, so you include business expenses in your income. Do you ever deduct these business expenses from your taxable income? (Remember we're discussing taxes here, not gross revenue). One thing is for sure...

Right, twice that much is 100k. That's still lower than 250k. The flytiger's "all of them" making more than 250k simply shows him to be the ***hole that he is calling others.

Real life? Are you talking about the plumbers who broke into the Watergate Hotel? http://www.payscale.com/research/US/Job=Master_Plumber/Salary Median Salary by Years Experience - Job: Master Plumber (United States) Currency: USD | Updated: 10/10/2008 | Individuals reporting: 257...

:)

I was quoting CNN. :)

Factcheck: Joe the tax cheat. Here is the court docket: http://apps.co.lucas.oh.us/onlinedockets/Docket.aspx?STYPE=1&PAR=LN200701803-000&STARTDATE=01/01/1900&ENDDATE=01/01/2100&PARTY=D,1 FILING DATE: 1/26/2007 CASE TYPE: ACV ACTIVATION OF CASE MONETARY AMOUNT...

McCain won in two categories. Eighty percent of debate watchers polled said McCain spent more time attacking his opponent, with seven percent saying Obama was more on the attack. Fifty-four percent said McCain seemed more like a typical politician during the debate, with 35 percent saying Obama...

That pretty much sums it up. :D

What did you smoke? :)

If I wanted to educate you on evolution, I would do it in an evolution thread. By changing the subject, I take it that you have given up on debating the original point that Republicans are anti-intellectual.

The country is going socialist regardless of who wins the election. In fact, you can bet that it will go socialist faster if McCain wins.

Good point. This story basically says the same thing: http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/1008/Voting_for_Obama_anyway.html?showall It's a story told by a Republican consultant doing a focus group study of a 527 attack ad in an upper-midwestern state. And below is what he said. Reagan...

Even though this is politics and religion, hijacking a thread would still be bad manners. Going back on topic, the Republican party today does not hide its disdain for knowledge. You have no credibility on this topic, just like z10, because both of you have been anti-science.

So you're not as foolhardy as your first post implied. :) But the long term trend is already telegraphed by the bailout. You can't blame it on Obama already! McCain voted for it too.

Interesting. What is the time line? Where is/will be your entry? When will you bail?