Search results

Don't believe the tapes will help find a solution to why 14:25 isn't a sequence completion and 14:30 isn't a signal for change.

Beginning to have suspicion that the lime RTL is the 'real deal'.

I had nightmares about 11/19. Some would say that I am developing an unhealthy obsession.:D

Somehow I am missing that which suggests that 14:25 isn't a sequence completion and 14:30 isn't a signal for change.

faster fractal aka sub-fractal aka intra-fractal

Only made it that far before running into the mental block.

If that's the case then the red decreasing gaussian cannot end at point 1, otherwise we end up with point 1 being at the trough of R\/B - which is an impossibility. Agreed. If your first level gaussians are the ones located below the second level gaussians, then I still can't see the B2B...

I see.:) If I am not mistaken, you have decreasing red gaussian drawn from 10:40 bar to 11:25 bar. Which is how one annotates a non-dominant portion of up traverse. In which case it also means that you propose the 10:40 bar to be a point 2 in the up traverse. So, where's the point 1...

:D Well, in that case where does one put the trough of B2B?

The market 'fanned' out on the way down, so it had to do the same on the way up. Also, if one thought that 11:30 to 12:10 was a 5 min ES level traverse - where would one put B2B (specifically the rising 2nd B of B2B) under that assumption? Which is another way of saying what ehorn already...

Damn! I need a new pair of eyes. The rising R of R2R ends at 10:40 bar. The answer definitely lies in correctly annotated chart. The 10:15 bar marked with pink point 2 is non-dominant. I have to test this hypothesis now to make sure this observation holds any significance. Thank you...

Thank you. My data also shows Gaussian slope acceleration on 10:35 bar - so it must be Peak Volume then and a signal for change in brown down traverse, which at 10:35 appears to have all components necessary for 5 min ES level Traverse ( it even shares the same point 2 with the pink 5 min ES...

Thank you for the chart. Was 10:35 a Pace Acceleration and the reason why the sequence for the pink down traverse was not completed until 11:20?

Gureito Sukotto! Jack Hershey is the real deal. What is possible is also inevitable. I know that it is quite counter-intuitive notion, so don't make an effort to understand it right now. However, one day, when you least expect it, the answer may suddenly come to you. Learning to think...

Volume can be a very exceptional exception for those who believe that it is the leading indicator of Price.

Precisely the type of fallacious thinking that an average member of the middle class species has been conditioned to exhibit. Confusing credentials with credibility. The rich somehow managed to assure the generational continuation due to social connections and introductions as an ultimate litmus...

Oh, well. As a whole, the ET closely resembles a statistical snapshot of Caucasian North American/ Western European male college graduates. And as such, doesn't even deserve the word "simplistic". "Puerile" however comes to mind as most appropriate.

ROFLMAO. Absolutely loved it. 1a2b3cppp obviously has trouble differentiating Jell-O from KY-Jelly. His/her line of thinking is that since both sound similar and appear to have somewhat similar physical properties they must have been intended for the same orifice. Or, as the good doctor...

He is a good man - he brought Jack Hershey to ET. So tomorrow he is definitely on a very short list of people to give thanks to.

I take it that the trendlines in your snip are for a faster fractal (sub-fractal) traverse and not for a 5 min ES level traverse. Otherwise one of us is missing something (something like a critical component of monitoring:D perhaps). P.S. 1235 OB is a red bar