Search results

I'm not really sure that Esignal is the best. Yesterday would be a good example. According to 3dog's research, IQfeed had the correct data. Nevertheless, you make a very valid point. It's certainly frustrating and I'm glad that you summed up the problem, Electric. It's difficult for us to...

Thanks 3dog, that explains it. The time corresponds to exactly where that one tick shows up for me. Any idea about the low on the 11:00 bar? (Since you seem to be a data guru :) )

no pm, I'm curious about the lows of those two bars as reflected on your chart. Trying to pin down where the data discrepancy is. My broker's charts, from yet another data vendor, agree with mine. That the 10:50 bar made the low of the day at 973.00, and the low of the 11:00 bar was...

Yes it is extremely frustrating. Obviously there's inaccuracy somewhere. My 11AM (Central) bar didn't even retest that low. And volume looks different as well.

Again, I don't show a divergence. Will be sadly interesting to compare our charts.

I'm using IQFeed. Looks like there's a significant difference in our data, at least today. This is really annoying. I'll have to find a way to confirm accuracy one way or the other.

Hmm, that divergence didn't show up the same way for me. Chaikin plotted differently. I haven't had problems with seeing the signals before. What's wrong here?

Interesting. I see that ADX just popped up past 30, but I don't see a divergence in Chaikin.

It will be interesting to see how you determine that it's time for an adjustment, as well as your approach to calculating any necessary changes.

no_pm, How are you handling trade setups where you just got stopped out on the same continuing trend? Let me try to be more clear: Let's say that you have a perfect setup for a short, and then your stop loss gets hit a little while later. Now there's another setup within the same trend...

I'd PM you about this, Magna, but I just wanted to make it clear to everyone that I am in total agreement and apologize for my inane off topic posts yesterday. Particular apologies to no_pm. By way of explanation, not excuse, I was very stressed last night and vented in the completely wrong...

Thanks for the reminder Magna, you are correct of course.

Well I hope I can analyze some historical data this weekend. If anyone's counting on me..... well, my mother managed to sit on her glasses tonight. So tomorrow's gonna be a scramble for new frames at least! Perhaps new lenses. There goes the profit for the week, hehe.

Thanks, I'll have a look at that. Took a peek and I'm not sure that it applies to this case. Better that I know that it's doable, so I can learn to do it myself instead of trying to pierce this guy's code. Let's not get off topic here though. I think we all owe a round of applause to no_pm...

Interesting RCM..... I'm looking forward to checking things out back in time then. Comparing notes is interesting! no_pm, for how long have you been applying this technique as is?

I'm not an Easylanguage expert. Getting better at it, but not there yet! Actually the divergence code was written for me by someone else. I can use it with the stochastics, but the file itself is protected (tied into my TS customer ID too). Which, by the way, was NOT according to our deal...

Jeepers I've only looked back as far as June of this year so far. Found a trade almost every day with a much higher win to loss ratio. There would have to be a radical difference for the number of trades over time to drop so much in the previous year. Honestly no offense intended, but are you...

Thanks for the reply. I shoulda put a smiley after "secrets". :) It's very nice of you to reply individually to all the questions and comments. Your logic and writing skills are better on little sleep than most people's are when fully rested.

I didn't expect that you'd want to share all your hard earned secrets. But at least you're confirming that it's a divergence based system as well. In your experience, does the technique which you ARE sharing produce a sufficient return (for now) that it's worth using on it's own? I ask...

I can't wait to hear about the advanced method! :)