Search results

Before we can go any further to what Jack posted, the price cases have to be correct and the question which volume bar can be used or not for the volume test procedure. The first disagreement is on bar 6. Bar 6 to you is a XB. But what do you get if you remove the gap between the close of bar...

Do we agree on this? Bar 1: XB, use volume Bar 2: XB, use volume Bar 3: XR, use volume Bar 4: XR, use volume Bar 5: XB, use volume Bar 6: Hitch, wait Bar 7: XB, use volume Bar 8: Hitch, use volume Bar 9: Lat3, wait Bar 10: XB, use volume Bar 11: XB, use volume Bar 12: XB, use...

3x5 cards are nice if they contain useful information. Writing "Price case" only for Laterl didn't help you before and didn't help you here. A drawing might have helped also putting a an equation, something like: "If highs and lows of bar 2 and 3 <= bar 1....". So your cards are for quick...

Correct. If you look at the illustrations of the ten cases then you don't see open and close drawn. In the past... if I recall it correctly... then the example I gave you would had been labeled as IBGS ( Intra bar Gaussian shift). But if you look at Jack's current posts in this thread then...

The illustration would have challenged me. Bar two looks like a T1 and therefore bar three like a P2. The illustration maybe needs an additional note that in THIS example bar two is not used because it is an internal. Correct?

Look at the highs and lows. High and low of current bar greater than high and low of previous bar then you have an XB. If high and low are lower then you have XR. Your question marks should be: XB XR XB XR XB XR I think what confuses you is that for example based on highs and lows...

I think now you got it. :)

I stopped at bar 22 and looked in your log. Based on the chart that tiddlywinks posted I can see that bar 22 had larger volume than bar 21. Is that correct? So the UL should be on bar 22. This shows us that either in your chart display or log (or both) we are missing some important...

My comments would be: a) No. b) Go back a few posts in this thread and see Jack's definition of a lateral c) Go back to the other thread and see the same thing described there And as last comment: Fix your glossary. Is your glossary really useful or is it only a collection of...

You are excited. Therefore in your mind you are already jumping ahead to the next exciting topic/subject. Don't. Remember... first: 5 x 81 bars! :) Then the next step. P. S. Good job!

I looked at your VE drawing instructions and had a laugh because it reminded me of a discussion we had a few month ago. Do you remember this: http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/reply.php?s=&action=newreply&postid=3870787 And now I read this: "...To accommodate a VE, accelerate the channel by...

:D Sorry... couldn't resist... Jack, you are experiencing the feelings of a CW trader!? You should try MADA... and you will feel support, comfort and confidence. :) Btw... if you try to live healthy then go all the way and ditch your artificial "diet" crap food and drinks.

Found it. But now the question is: Why don't you use the volume bands on 30min as well? And in general... Why do you use bands instead of gaussian lines?

Will you share the 30min? Why do you annotate channels in 30min but not in 5min? Why do you sometimes seem to start to draw channels in 5min but then don't continue?

Hey Jack, hang in there! Don't pass away, yet! I will try to catch up faster! :) But... sooner or later we will all have to say "Good Bye". I'm sure you already thought about the time after your death and made some provisions. What will happen to all your charts, logs, binders, notes...

You don't need to degap if you do the degaping mentally. But imagine how much clearer Jack's charts could be if the bars on his charts were automatically degaped. All those additional, assistance lines he has to add on price would be gone. You degap to see the price CASES clearly and...

The whole (OHLC) previous bar(s) has to be moved the amount of the difference between open of current bar vs close of previous bars. Examples were in this thread I think. Look also for posts of db_sezwhat he had some examples. It should be independent of timeframe. If there is a gap in...

Could you please repost the chart? It seems to be damaged.

Jack needs to explain this. When I originally glanced over the chart I saw that bar 4 was a BO of the RTL. However you had to degap that bar and ended with an internal. This meant that you couldn't run the volume test procedure. Next bar 5 arrives, gives permission to run the volume test...

Quote from Jack (just in case Jack or somebody else has doubts): "...You may only have a TRUE BO of the rtl if and only if. a T1 is there and a P2 has not appeared before (at a lock in) the BO of the rtl. If you have not annotated the P2 it has not appeared as yet just for the time being..."...