Search results

Careful Mickey. The old religiclous -gentle persuasion passive with a touch of praise- approach detected.:wtf: this'll be next.... :)

I didn't claim the pic was of Jesus. You made that assumption, though I'm not surprised as it is after all the idealization of a dark skinned Middle Eastern Jew purposely made to look like a white skinned Western Christian. That picture can just as much stand as a representation of Bible David...

Well in case you don't Post another Daily Bible Verse, let me post some Bible for you instead Psalm 55:15 Let death seize upon them, and let them go down quick into hell for wickedness is in their dwellings, and among them. :wtf: nice:rolleyes: whatever happened to Love Thine Enemies:confused:

yeah well...it is Elite Trader not Bible Verses R Us - for fks sakes. There's really no good reason you should expect to make post after post of sickeningly pious horseshit unchallenged without people calling you out. You are being very naive to believe otherwise if you don't mind me saying...

Reading the Bible cover to cover is a great way to help people become atheist. Some of the most debauched activities and awful atrocities along with tirades of absurdly insane stories ever told are all in there. Christian believers don't read them or learn how to ignore them, or find a whole...

do ya just visit local football games for the Hail Mary passes? :)

Perhaps on this occasion, it's just that you read the article using the acuity of a 4 year old in a Batman suit.

hmm, about the context... very interesting indeed;)

1 Parrot and a Pony. It's a start.:confused:

Pseudoscience ( more commonly referred to as bullshit) is defined as not-science. It's an activity intended to resemble science but instead is based on fallacious assumptions. (Not to be confused with phallic assumptions, which is something else entirely!) Student's "Rocks can't fold without...

I can show you some pseudoscience as evidence. Will that do? You showed pseudoscience as evidence and of course it is considered a myth. An old myth story told by different religions in different ways.

What are you guys so razzled about? You babble about a flood , I about a Beanstalk. One good myth deserves another is all it amounts to.:p

OMG thank you so much student for your excellent post! I've been looking everywhere for that kind of myth supporting pseudo-scientific-evidence. Now at last I'll be able to use the same method to bypass any awkward laws of physics to prove my "Jack and the Beanstalk Theory". :)

...probably be due to the fact that God, was always a really bad idea.

yuk :vomit: but do always remember that Christian message kids, If You Don't Sin, Jesus Died For Nothing! Go forth and sin - for tomorrow may ye repent (or next day if more convenient)

What an ignorantly absurd thing to say ... on hearing anything that doesn't jive with your religiclous philosophy, all you got is.. never gets old:rolleyes:

So let me ask, why will a spontaneous or accidental event be a one off ? There's no rule to say that must be so. I don't see why an engineer such as yourself would presume such a thing. Decay of a nucleus can reasonably be considered at least in general terms as random spontaneous events. This...

I very much appreciate your sentiments mickey. I just don't see why a random, spontaneous or accidental event isn't more beautiful and wondrous than one which can only be imagined to be one guided by yet another agency, which bears none of those hallmarks .:)