Search results

  1. P

    Liberal hypocrisy

    Liberal hypocrisy Redundant title IMHO.
  2. P

    Disproving atheists in 82 seconds

    Sorry but you are the one that is using the following fallacy. Burden Of Proof: the claim that whatever has not yet been proved false must be true (or vice versa). Essentially the arguer claims that he should win by default if his opponent can't make a strong enough case...
  3. P

    Disproving atheists in 82 seconds

    I didn't ask you that. I merely asked you to identify what would constitute evidence for you. The fact that you cannot identify 1 event, circumstance, or discovery that would suffice as evidence (not proof mind you just evidence ) to satisfy you, just means you are: inept to come to a...
  4. P

    U.S. soldier goes on shooting spree in Aghanistan, killing 16 including 9 children

    Can we just leave now and let this country go back to the 7th century where we found it?
  5. P

    Disproving atheists in 82 seconds

    Funny how you can't come up with 1 hypothesis to test but are all too certain no evidence exists yet supposedly I'm the stupid narrow minded one. :confused: typical
  6. P

    republican? Ignorance Is Strength

    Liberals bring the "special" to special education. :p
  7. P

    Romney 48% Obama 43%

    +100 :D
  8. P

    How much of your taxes go to waste on welfare cheats ?

    Welfare fraud isn't the problem, welfare itself is the problem.
  9. P

    Disproving atheists in 82 seconds

    You tell me there is no evidence "that God exists". Okay fine tell me what would meet your criteria for evidence supporting"that God exists" then?
  10. P

    Disproving atheists in 82 seconds

    Call me an agnostic believer. I believe for my own personal reasons but can I prove it to someone else? no I can't even PROVE IT to myself that God exists. However those who say a creator does not exist, I find kinda silly or angry sometimes both.
  11. P

    Disproving atheists in 82 seconds

    Since I'm the one who posited the question I thought you were referencing me , sorry.
  12. P

    Disproving atheists in 82 seconds

    Concerning bertie russell : There's no fool like an overly clever fool. "esp with an axe to grind"
  13. P

    Disproving atheists in 82 seconds

    Well of course not, your worldview cannot process that question and remain the same. So you blithely pretend the elephant in the room hasn't sat on your head.:eek:
  14. P

    Disproving atheists in 82 seconds

    REALLY! , are you so stupid(cognitive dissonance) as to not recognize the good ole "the universe has always existed" is the exact equivalence to the other side arguing "God has always existed". Sheesh and the previous poster thought this was a good argument. unbelievable hypocrisy ...
  15. P

    Disproving atheists in 82 seconds

    Sorry jem . but I'm fully aware that time began with the big bang. Sorry that this question appears to flummox you so much.
  16. P

    Disproving atheists in 82 seconds

    I'm sorry you failed to understand the point. Your red herring distraction about matter/energy are immaterial: for all you have done is changed the question to "how did energy come from no energy?" So I'll spell it out to you. Both depend as equally as the other on some (quite potentially...
  17. P

    Romney 48% Obama 43%

    With my impression of the gross incompetence ,naivete, greed,and racial bias of the obama voters last election, I hardly see how he can lose.
  18. P

    republican? Ignorance Is Strength

    It's not that education is a complete waste of time it's just that one must recognize the pseudo-sciences are full of BS. If one must take those types of classes (and they do for a liberal arts degree) it's best to just learn the bias of your instructor and fake it until you achieve your...
  19. P

    republican? Ignorance Is Strength

    Perhaps, but it hasn't been my experience that conservatives have been those "suffer(ing) from illusory superiority, mistakenly rating their ability much higher than average." it's been those steeped in the self congratulatory incestuousness of academic pseudo-science and it's laurels that have...
  20. P

    Difference between black on white crime and white on black crime

    It's a perfectly rational strategy by the democrats they simultaneously have a group they can both look down upon and exploit financially and politically whilst giving the false impression of caring, solace and justice.
Back
Top