Search results

Exactly right. I've thought about that often the past few years, especially in light of how many people were living off of extended unemployment benefits, the uptick in food stamp usage and a host of other "freebie's" that didn't even exist a decade ago. The more the govt. subsidizes the...

One of the most rabid leftist bloggers I've had the misfortune of reading has repeatedly made this point. Essentially, he makes "just enough" not to qualify for the real big subsidies and is of the age that he has a few more years before he can enroll in medicare. His quote of $16,000+ a year...

Yeah, somehow I'm not buying that the 48million or so folks collecting food stamps are all "actively seeking employment".

Says the guy from that cesspool known as Detroit. Remind us again how many Republicans ran that shithole into the ground. (Disclaimer: both parties are essentially worthless).

Where's AK47 and his progressive propoganda when it's needed most? Hopefully Ricter or the other handful of "useful idiots" can get busy "cuttin and pastin" to perpetuate the myth.

The guy has the emotional IQ of a watermelon. When he isn't ranting about all of his failed trades, he does a "drive by" into the P&R section and unloads more of his incoherent ramblings.

He and Ricter have ALOT in common.

Right. Price, quality and coverage. To subsidize the boomer's with pre-existing's, they will try and gouge the young and healthy...which also happen to be the most indebted with the LEAST ability to absorb those enormous price increases. I disagree that we will know the true figures in...

Probably because the majority of traders are white...Anything that is a predominantly white endeavour is considered "rayciss".

Bullshit.

From what I've read thus far, I believe the "boomer's" are really the demographic that will take advantage of the changes. Many of them are of the age that they would fall into the "pre-existing" category and have already been priced out of the market. So they will probably sign up. OTOH...

Crap, I thought you were talking about the riddler. Seems there are more of them.

Your attempts to "obfuscate" every single thread in P&R are "not related to the subject", yet you do so every single day and in every single thread. Per usual, you take offense whenever anyone else simply plays "your game". Kinda like your typical "ignore function" hypocricy.

Paging Riddler for a cut and paste apologist article.

Ricter showing his unwavering support for the rentier class.

More or Ricter's limousine liberal schtick. As an unabashed Krugman fanboy, he rails about the "rentier" class ad nauseum, yet never connects the dots with how said monetary policies so firmly entrench that class. When confronted with the reality that the "O-man" completely abandoned his...

Everyone has met an asshole like him. He's the guy who will play "devil's advocate" ad absurdum. He'll tell you that you are wrong, then proceed to explain to you the exact same thing you just said, but will take full credit for his explanation.

His posts are COMPLETELY on topic, in case you forgot the thread title. You can tone down the arrogance a tad as well.

Great post.

If given the chance, I think that I would trade Rectum for IQ-47. He really is that much of an imbecile.