Search results

of course she can gain the white house - the american public's reelection of bush/cheney/iraq has to remind us that ignorance has no bounds. disagree about Bill - politically, they should focus on him exclusively. she should stay out of it as much as possible - try to get people to forget...

because insurance companies don't like paying claims. same reason he can't smoke a cigar in a bar, or ride a motorcycle without a helmet. drunk kids cause accidents, accidents cost money, lobbyists bribe politicians for laws to save insurance companies money. there is no opposing lobby.

no mention of Bonham? :eek: Baker and Moon also shoo-ins for a greatest-ever list

what about the tens of thousands of civilians, women, children, elderly, bombed to death throughout iraq, particularly baghdad? people that did nothing criminal at all, people who wouldn't know there was a chance of the us "blowing up their ass"?

upon what do you base a conclusion of danger to spain, nigeria, or indonesia from iran?

how many news reports are done from street-level iraq, independent of the US military? how many interviews does the media broadcast with average (non-politician) iraqis? how much evidence is presented to prove purported changes in the security situation? how much of anything stated by the...

at the hardware level, but it can be changed in software: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MAC_address#Changing_MAC_addresses some good general background on a few of the topics in this thread: http://www.ipprimer.com/section.cfm http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/index.html :cool:

ah, well that settles it then. everybody can stop panicing now. whew.

"Wall Street never changes. The stories change, the pockets change, the suckers change, but Wall Street never changes because human nature never changes." - Jesse Livermore

hurrah for the neocons. the most dangerous man in the world has been killed. why don't you moonbat libs get it? one picture of a dead guy validates the hundreds of billions in tax dollars and tens of thousands of casualties. and we know that he was the most dangerous man in the world...

exactly. it's cheap airtime for the newsmedia - no journalism or research required, just give coulter a call and get instant controversy. and sure she deserves respect for her success - she's made an occupation of uttering mostly unsubstantiated anectdotal arguments and cruel ad hominems...

if that were the problem, then why doesn't the bush proposed amendment simply limit the application of the full faith clause with respect to state laws on marriage? don't know if that would work, but it would be a less restrictive proposal, and support the idea of states passing laws that...

lol. P.T. Barnum proved right, yet again. you can't blame them for trying -- and if they can get away with distracting people from this string of political disasters by shoveling the same transparently-false crap TWICE, after completely ignoring it for the last 2 years, it would be a true...

:eek: "spoiled little brats"? "Newt Gingritch"? I'd like to say this is a parody, but I doubt you have the imagination to come up with something so asinine for humor's sake.

in related news, a bear was recently spotted shitting in the woods....

thanks for the lesson. the major media companies are an oligopoly, and some have total monopoly power in different regions. further, they have enormous lobbies and legislative influence. that situation does not lend itself to "capatilism," much less to the free market-style competition...

let me guess, you call yourself a "Christian," too. there have been many horrible things said on ET, but this one may be the most despicable yet. you should be ashamed of yourself for advocating such a thing, even in jest.

:eek:

interesting, but too complicated. if it can't fit within a 3-sentence sound bite, it's too complicated for the voting majority. rove proved that brilliantly - his followers ignored 100's of wasted billions, illegal wars, torture prisons, illiteracy of the candidate, etc., because of "gay...

no. of course the homeowner's association can kick out people who have volunteered to be subject to its rules, and who later break them. but it cannot impose its rules, by force, on unwilling people. the state can. hence the false analogy.