Search results

You do understand that none of the candidates require independent psych evals, nor does anyone in public office, nor do CEOs of publicly listed companies, nor do professionals such as doctors and lawyers. The smart people know who is who and what is what which allows some very insightful trading...

Small stops are fantastic especially at low timeframes, there's a trick to limit exposure from being whipsawed out, but you can try testing onclose manual stops with your strategy. Why would you willingly want to give the markets your capital, that's delusional. Oh of course, by using an...

Why do people bother replying why they have zero to add, obviously no one has any credentials. Try NuPic, they have a stock based demo and is one of the better ones. All this "knowledge" on these forums and no one knows a thing. Is ML worth it, if you can find an advantage against the millions...

Non-latency, like anyone here is going to be running an HFT, pathetic. AWS, yes, for many years.

Well as your reply was so intriguingly polite ...

The next great tech stock, not if you know what's beneath the surface.

It depends: you are managing peoples money so for most providers beating the benchmark index is the goal; you are generating income which means making the same as you would in a job; you are generating capital which is buy low sell high such as starting a business, income may or may not be part...

So here's the story about making sure you buy from Amazon only and not the marketplace sellers. Six months ago I couldn't find a computer that fit the bill, stupidly fast and incredibly reliable, so I just built it myself as, well, I know better. Lots of research choosing the best parts and put...

That depends if you're a 'new money' billionaire or an 'old money' billionaire, you can apply the techniques from one even if you have the capital from the other. So that's crap, it's a really nice lifestyle, it just depends on which approach you take.

You're a capital trader, @Stymie is an income trader. They are equally valid strategies, most traders use an income based approach, a few use a capital based approach, and a handful can do both such as Buffet. I'm one of those handful, but I gravitate to capital because it's less effort.

Yes, but that's a different strategy, be frugal with your own money and get other people to pay for it, that is an income trade. The credit crisis investment is a capital trade.

Of course, put your capital to work when the market is at the extremes of the normal distribution, not during the noise.

"Perfecting patience is all I’ve done over the past 50 years," Barros says. "I love when things get bad. When it’s bad, I buy." Becoming a billionaire is simple, perfection in your approach, the problem is that you have to interact with society and therefore you need to filter out the rubbish...

Another one, fantastic. Which is the location for tech that everyone immediately quotes, Silicon Valley, which is the university respected worldwide for tech, MIT, where are the most known tech firms in the world like Google, Facebook, Uber headquartered, the US. Don't you just love people who...

Let's wait an see who has the more absurd statement, time will tell. However given $3-5mn per day will buy you a jet in short order, your remote control airplane would be a fleet of predator drones, which interestingly have also been hacked. Always impressed people cannot do math on a site...

Right, so the US being the most technology advanced country with silicon valley and these bots went through their firewalls and detection systems, plus at present "To be sure, the White Ops report is an allegation from a single cybersecurity firm and cannot be independently verified by CNBC."...

There are two types of people who will buy indicators, the expensive indicators where the buyers want to find out how it works and either stop paying or build a pyramid structure reselling it but packaged in a different way. The indicator seller will never recoup their R&D costs. The second...

Seriously what is wrong with everyone mixing institutional HFT with fundamental analysis that anyone can use including retail, are their brains so fused that they cannot separate them, because they are different discussions.

The market always has an agenda, the only time it doesn't is when the insiders using their pre-data, legitimate or not, get it wrong. Studies are irrelevant because you need an insider to prove the use of pre-knowledge data, and that's not going to happen. The whistleblower shoots themselves...

That's too funny. Actually they should have two options, ignore and hidden.