Search results

I didn't say to buy his shit.

Wins - 12 losses - 41 ; )

Results risking 1% of betting pot per stake

Of course it is possible. Compound 4 hands & you have 15/1 Mic Drop. That's The way to beat dealer playing perfect BJ strategy and not counting.

Can anyone beat Blackjack dealer applying money management? No card counting.

This doesn't look right, if it keeps going up it's signalling extended expectations of an inflationary environment. Has US invented a warp drive?

Yes!

Holding long Gbp

You're holding for a home run and scale out trader keeps scaling out, how is it you're doing the same?

You're not understanding. All in trader can't do what scale out trader can. Two different strategies at times.

Not if win rate is very low, as your losses will eat up all eventual profit, whereas scaling out will be in profit as win rate will be much higher due to banking part of position early on.

But there are more than 2 possible strategies and outcomes.

I posted an example where scale out strategy has outperformed due to win ratio (which is random).

Buy1Sell2 is making a statement about a strategy that it relevant to him and he wants everyone to trade like him. That's a fallacy of his statement assuming we all trade the same way. I don't scale in/out, yet I see how it can be more profitable sometimes depending on variables.

Inferior? Wrong. Why? Because there are many variables that can influence end result in both strategies. If you want +20 point gain, then I'd make more $ scaling out after +2 gain if +20 is hit 1/10 attempts. Again that's subject to distribution of position (how much is scale out).

It's a divergence...

Naz to 5400 B4 6000

What's "hier"?

Fabulous!