Search results

Reposted below from another thread: -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Well that just the problem “you having no time to see Andreas's videos”. If you are in a quest to find the real fundamentals and derived value of something so disruptive as bitcoin...

Well that just the problem “you having no time”. If you are in a quest to find the real fundamentals and derived value of something so disruptive as bitcoin you have to invest a lot of time to study the implications of a completely new asset. I myself spent more than 3-months studying this...

None of the above... You never get rid of certain types of weed.

BTC-pro's don't agree, but I will not spend my precious time to you in explaining it over and over again. You should watch Andreas Antonopoulos on this issue as well.

I can do that, but lack the time right now (and in my past posts I spend a lot of effort already: which was mostly wasted by the trolling comments). If you really want to learn the value of Bitcoin (usefulness + rarity = value) then I strongly recommend you to see all videos in the youtube...

Ahh so you think that bictoin was the first? And should be replaced by something final like Facebook? Well, Bitcoin wasn't the first at all. It was more like this: ecash/digicash-1995 >> hash cash-1997 >> bit gold-1998 >> Bitcoin-2008.

Well hear what this analyst has to say about Prince Alwaleed: https://www.cnbc.com/video/2017/10/23/bitcoin-price-could-hit-50000-in-a-few-years-analyst-says.html

Not aware of any... It doesn't have reply-protection (yet), which is very dangerous for exchanges.

No it hasn't. Just as the current BitcoinGold fork will not hurt BTC. Although the November S2X fork is a bit more risky, I think it might crash BTC temporally (if so: a nice moment to buy more). BTC is already heading to $5100.... November-20 is nearing :-)

I just found a "conversation" between us, from 2013. Admit: I was right all that time :-)

Pekelo, in writing the above..... in all those years you are trolling crypto threads, you haven't learned anything yet. You keep repeating the same 2013 nonsense. There is a reason why the Dollar is king of Fiat, and Facebook is king of Social-media and Bitcoin is king of crypto. And it has...

Yes and? There are thousands of Facebook clones in the world as well. Only a few of them including Facebook itself will survive.

You are right: Drugs did kick start Bitcoin in the early years. But that's no longer the only driver (very probably not even the main driver anymore: which proves the not existing price-dump when the lastest big dark-market was closed by the FBI earlier this year). Actually the current...

A pity indeed. But you were here at ET participating in bitcoin related threads in 2013 (I can remember posts you were trolling me). At that time, $100 was a very good price, as well as $200 in 2015. And actually I think if the price crashes in coming November to say $3000, it will be a good...

There is no doubt in my mind: that are wrong. And if you are so sure put your money where your mouth is, like I did. And we will talk again in say 10 Years? or more if you want additional room for getting it right? Anyway: in my post I didn't agree in anyway with those entrepreneurships. I...

Oh boy ...unmasked...

Me not understand. Me from far away. Wat bedoel je eigenlijk?

Wrong, the SEC is very busy with all crypto related. Especially with the official requests to offer ETF's. In their replies and rejects they never ever have mentioned something about even the slightest possibility of a Ponzi. Just because it's obviously not the case.

Don't know anything about GRPN. But I'm very sure that if that was a Ponzi, the SEC would bring them to justice. As it is a real crime. As far as I know SEC didn't do that, it even didn't with Herbalife (which is in my opinion a real Ponzi). Bitcoin isn't even close to SEC's, IMF's and Justice...

No, it only proves that I cannot teach someone who doesn't want to use his brains.... My fault, sorry.