Search results

"already"? lol, where have you been for the last 6 years? the whole operation was a transparent farce from the get-go. the real reason to fear for the US is not economic, per se - economic trends are reversible. the irreversible changes that have occurred over the past 20 years (or at...

Excellent news. And compliments for listening to members and reevaluating your position. Thanks.

There must be better ways, but one (at least until ET removes the print format option, perhaps on the grounds that it is too useful) would be to click on the "print" format at upper right of page, then file -> save as -> web page to maintain the formatting. Or as plain text if you don't care...

Wow. That is just stupid. The value of this site is the accumulated knowledge posted by members. Now that you already have all of this information gathered, formatted, and stored for you for free, you delete it? Sorry to be blunt, Baron, but I can't see any rational reason for that...

the japanese have been waiting for 20 years, and counting. the real estate shills have been screeching this bs line about having to put a roof over your head, etc. for years. it was as ostensibly applicable in 2004 as in 2008, and it didn't stop the crash from happening.

Barron's apparently asked him directly to respond. He claims he doesn't have time to refute serious allegations from a major publication with a large circulation, because he's "traveling"? Come on.

greenspan/kudlow/pop-media propaganda. Any argument that is based on the premise that devaluing a currency is actually good for the people that earn it is absurd. Deliberate currency devaluation is theft of the production of the country. There are winners in the policy, but they are not...

putting aside your childish namecalling, what difference does it make what the caller's intent was? how does that change cramer's statement? cramer clearly, unequivocally, declared that BSC was "fine" and that worrying about it was silly. whether the caller was a shareholder, an...

Your post presents a conspiracy theory, lacking facts, as well.

http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/h/h_l_mencken.html

lol. that's too good.

there was no actual sexual conduct. it is not illegal to ask someone to have sex if there's no money involved, in a public or a private place, nor should it be.

technical matters aside, the troubling issue is the closed source code, and the lack of any rational justification for it. the machines are supposed to do 4 things only: present choices, receive input on voter selection, add inputs, and produce a total. all of these steps are trivial to code -...

it seems that in your frenzied state of bushlust you forgot to log out and log back in as "on the money" that time..... or maybe you're a troll with a sense of humor. if you really are a bush supporter, you are off to a good start fitting in.

:confused: could anything he would have done be worse than the complete failure of the imbecile you backed? there are a lot of legitimate reasons Gore should be criticized, but bush's list of accomplishments is certainly not one of them. besides, I would think the bobblehead contingent...

it depends on who "no one" is. obviously the popular media and bureaucrats will denigrate and mock him; his policies run counter to their interests. the same reason they are spinning hillary as a shoo-in, such a lock-in that it's not even worth your time to oppose her.

I don't have all the details - after a while the speculation got a bit tiring and I'm just waiting for the real end result - but for now I agree with you. the honorable thing would've been to disqualify everybody on the team from tire men to drivers -- but something tells me the sponsors...

excellent point -- any true scientist should welcome being proven wrong, and acknowledge that we only know a small fraction of what there is to know. we must admit that our understanding may be incomplete or totally wrong. the most brilliant men of 1000 years ago could not have predicted...

they're supposedly releasing their findings soon. here's a bit on the background: http://sport.guardian.co.uk/motorsport/story/0,,2167691,00.html the initial reports said they were stripped of constructors points for 2007 -- they hadn't decided on 2008. another year would be devastating...

what is your point? are you implying that either a hydrogen bomb or the sun violate the laws of thermodynamics?