Search results

outsourcing has little to do with the education levels of foreigners, they don't care if the worker is illiterate or has a PhD. "competitiveness" is a euphemism for willingness/need to work for 50 cents a day without any labor laws, pensions, social security, health care coverage, workers...

too bad the relevance filter is still under development :p

well put. another resource is Natenburg: http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/155738486X/qid=1111505251/sr=8-1/ref=sr_8_xs_ap_i1_xgl14/002-9688609-3507218?v=glance&s=books&n=507846 as Lefty said, take the time to get a solid grasp of what's involved - at the least you will see...

LOL. yes, it all makes sense now. 9/11, of course -- this time it's different.

thank you for denouncing this evildoer. evildoers threaten the homeland and corrupt the workers that make patriotic contributions to the homeland to fund the wars. freedom is slavery, comrade.

OldTrader - thanks for your posts, very interesting. a bit more on CA's scheme: http://www.law.duke.edu/journals/dlj/articles/dlj53p1399.htm

another great one -- note the date :D http://www.thestreet.com/_tscs/funds/smarter/891820.html

Oceania is at war with Eastasia. Oceania has always been at war with Eastasia.

http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=US&vol=000&invol=02-1624 they clearly ducked it - they based the lack of standing on custody claims on the child that arose after the suit was filed. do you really think a custody claim was the reason the case made it to the supreme...

there was a Livermore quote I had written down somewhere.... the gist of is was that "the market will never change, because human nature never changes" same applies to war. Goering's statement applied in all periods of history, and will in the future. assuming that is true, interesting...

see also: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doublethink :D

more leftist pinko garbage. the military does no wrong, bush does no wrong. period. and if you say otherwise, you're a terrorist-loving cocksucker. just ask pabst.

lol. good one. :)

a stellar response. there are few things more persuasive than a respectful ad hominem.

"We were in the midst of the worst terrorist act in history and here we were seeing an evacuation of the bin Ladens. ... I wanted to go the highest levels in Washington," Tom Kinton, director of aviation at Boston's Logan International Airport, told the magazine. Kinton said it was clear the...

http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn?pagename=article&contentId=A13558-2003Dec18&notFound=true

thank goodness bush didn't waffle in the face of al qaeda, instead ignoring bin laden and unwaveringly sacrificing 800 soldiers and wasting $300 billion to destroy an unrelated country.... wavering sure could've been deadly. it's hard to see how iraq could stabilize - seems the best to hope...

like, for example, in the 6 months prior to the invasion, when every news program on air featured at least one neocon/administration "official" blabbering hysterical propaganda and lies in response to softball setup questions, unopposed? of course they selectively report. the only solution...

no kidding. look at poor Jessica Lynch, hardly anyone heard her heroic tale of valor. and the learned philosophers of the pnac, basically blacklisted by the liberals from revealing the truth. and what about all the patriotic embedded reporters that were censored from reciting the pentagon's...

I'm guessing that you haven't worked in an american corporate or professional organization, right? making that statement in such an environment, in and of itself, would be enough to get you fired.