Search results

LOL! thanks for the laugh TorontoTrader...

what evidence do you base these assertions on? not the unsubstantiated soundbites, puerile political speeches, talking-head blustering that they used to sell the iraq debacle -- most or all of which have been shown to have been disingenuous, or even flat-out lies -- but real evidence of these...

Questions for Greenspan by Rep. Ron Paul, MD http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul253.html

geez, lot of controversy on this, very distracting. meanwhile.... http://icasualties.org/oif/ http://www.iraqbodycount.net/database/

why do you hate america? what are you, some kind of commun... errr... terrorist sympathizer? didn't you hear there's a war going on? a war means bush's handlers can do whatever they want. now get back on your knees and stop talking out of turn. :mad:

think from a principal's pov - probably been grinding it out for 20 years to get to principal, eyeing a municipal pension with health coverage and 30 yrs. of cruising around in an RV. think that guy is going to all of a sudden take a stand for the first amendment? risk "adminstrative leave,"...

small correction: laws mandating auto insurance are there to protect the insurance companies, not you. this is a feature you may find curiously common to most nanny-state, "for your own good"-type laws.

does this mean we can censor the Internet now?

another interesting recent issue: http://www.cnn.com/2006/LAW/02/28/scotus.texas/

there's the key line - he should put that in the title, to allow even quicker identification of the essay as yet more propaganda. (but it's good of him forgive us for our stupidity and to clear up the mystery of why the dumb masses don't see the wonderous successes he does - obviously, it's...

don't forget avoidance of that pesky half of soc. sec. taxes, sex harassment and discrimination litigation, maternity leave, ADA compliance, OSHA reg's, ERISA/401k, etc., and of course, unions and their annoying tendency to advocate on behalf of employees. another thing to realize is that the...

backed with what? what is promised by such a "promissory note"? as Rearden said, it's just a piece of paper - it's not redeemable for anything anymore.

http://www.buchanan.org/000-p-issues.html http://www.wndbookservice.com/products/BookPage.asp?prod_cd=c6536

sounds like a familiar strategy. anyway, where were these concerns 5 years ago? their policies haven't changed one iota since day one -- all of a sudden NOW it's a crisis? why now? they had bush speaking today - he actually advocated continuing the current policy of ignoring the law and...

a quote that Rearden no doubt appreciates:

interesting site - thanks for pointing it out sulong :cool:

that seems to be the case at least for some of the exaggerated, immature versions shown in this thread. much of this is a group-identity exercise and a way to get attention and disobey "the man" without any actual risk. however, their activities do not preclude a rational, educated view from...

well then assuming the force of his weight is less than the force necessary to bend the bar, then of course he would lift himself off the ground. but we don't know how much all that mechanical gadgetry weighed - remember we're talking the late 70's here, given that it was done by military...

true - but that would apply to all of his superhuman feats (throwing stuff across the room, picking cars up, etc.) - all of which would presumably stress his non-mechanical joints, as well as overload his non-mechanical supporting muscles. so we have to neglect the weak-spine factor, or else...

ah, well the mommie-dearest thing helps explain the intense viciousness in your posts above....