Search results

Quick correction. The early time frame is quark confinement, not quark decoupling. Scratch any reference to the latter.

Well, Horhay, that makes as much sense as the rest of your posts.

If you'd bothered to read any of my posts with an open mind you would see that I generally respond in like kind. Your posts are fairly empty and receive equivalent responses, though occasionally, like now, I'll take a little time to let others know that you're not worth the effort. If you...

... because of the specific lapse in logic shown in my previous post where? All I'm hearing is presupposition; the presupposition that because you don't like it, it therefore isn't. Since you obviously have such a strong grasp on the subject, feel free to chime in with an answer to the...

[/b]Thank you. I appreciate the freedom. [/b]Got it. If I spread nonsense as truth I’ll get shot down And I won’t be surprised. Anything else? Ooh, you know me so well. Thanks again.

[/b]Okay, you win. That’s more irrelevant. [/b]Okay, let me see if I understand you. You want to create a belief by digging it up on the Internet and then tell me a) that is what I believe, or b) that is what I should believe, or c) that is what I should refrain from believing. Okay...

Hmm...and pasta tastes good with garlic. This IS a contest of who can make the most irrelevant statement, right? (Do I win?)

[/b]Actually, I did. I did I did I did. [/b]Yup, I learnt it in a place called “college” (in my pre-med days). [/b]Okay, I didn’t do THAT math, but I did do the simple math that was required to reach an approximation. I wasn’t looking for the precision to set an atomic clock, nor was...

Isn't genocide a view that you should tolerate? Where exactly do you draw the tolerance line? I'm confused.

Read my last post. You made a number of assumptions that turned out to be wrong. And then demolished your straw-men.

Tell it to Thunderdog. He says we're supposed to be tolerant.

[/b]Yup, it does. The rest of your post prompted my wife to ask me what I was laughing about. You’re a good writer; you have talent. I didn’t really want to get into another discussion on physics, anyway. Much, anyway. Teensy bit left, though. Here comes. Tensor equations...

[/b]Actually, he was quoting Jesus about people who were so dominated by their “god of this world” that they would react to hearing the word of God in exactly the manner in which you have reacted. So, if the shoe fits. I don’t think correctly identifying both the motivation and...

Another cave-in.

See NOTE2 in previous post.

Please show how these quotes were taken out of context. If you cannot, then I think your own credibility, or what little remained, will evaporate completely.

[/b]How so? [/b]Where did I do that? Also, since I’m not trying to be exact, despite your claim that I am, I used words like “about.” I used these particular words so no one would assume I was attempting to be precise. Actually, I’m using numbers developed by those who are doing the...

You don't have a clue. Which is it -- do you accept the bible as true or not? If you do, then you have some serious problems in your own conformity. If not, why do you think you can use it to point out someone's weakness? NOTE2: It doesn't really work, because if you disagree with...

Thanks for the vote of confidence.

Interesting you should bring that up. Anyone reading that thread has to notice how you were shot down there, as well. Thanks.