Search results

If this were Babe Ruth it would be one thing; but pj, I don't think so.

Asymmetric information; pretty expensive.

Too bad creativity (risk adjusted) doesn't amount to much.

No need to be concerned -- it's the guru gene pool at work.

dilution is the solution.

What the hell was that? I mean, that chart.:confused:

Payoffs are equivalent -- basic DAAC.

Conundrum; irrational exuberance meets the fed.

They can pillow fight in my room anytime they feel the urge. LOL ... when they're done, then we can talk about straddles.

Up. Hops is on the rise.

Yeah, amendment 18 was a real winner too. Do we really need an explicit law to institute the obvious? Or, have you found an iron ore worthy of trade? May be add some chickens to your goat portfolio -- ask your edward jones rep for details.

I'd fund the account with the full 50k, and index 60% and trade the residual. There's not a whole lot you can do with 3.5k; except give it away.

Bookstaber has a new book? That might make me a wackoff trader.:D

I agree with damnit. Short term variance f$ck's with me as well. 1/2 mil will come in due time.

IB is great, albeit it takes some intelligence.

The more risk is defined, the less ridged the allocation.

It has this thingy called a machine gun. Basically the limit is adjusted until filled. I've used BT for about 3 yrs and never seen the thing go off; heaven forbid should it.

Freud would have said you were molested by your mother at childhood, but we all know it was the other way around.

Absolute money quantity doesn't matter, it's residual returns that implies level.

As long as you're wearing aluminum foil, you are a. o. k.